Hello, I'm wondering if it wouldn't be better to choose 3-4 games with a max win of over 100,000x and then only play those 3-4 games with low stakes until you hit the big win? With the low stakes, your balance isn't lost as quickly each time, and you can still win big with low stakes. Does anyone have any experience with this?

I would be interested in your opinion.

Hey, it might not be a bad idea, but the chance of max win crashing is probably not that great. I've never really thought about it. How often does maxwin fall on a slot. You can definitely try it, but it's about luck and you could play there for a year and it might not drop and I could get there on the first day and be lucky. 

So I don't think it's really important how much or how often you play, but maybe somehow statistically you might have a chance of hitting it. But I don't think it's a big deal. Obviously you'd have to know how many players play the game how often and so on. 

It's all hypothetical what we're talking about, but hopefully one day you'll get lucky enough to actually win the max win.????

It's not necessarily important to me to reach the max win, but in games like Tombstone Slaughter by No Limit City, which has a max win of over 300,000x, even 50,000x would be enough. That's still a big win with, say, a 20 cent stake. By comparison, most other games have a max win between 5,000x and 20,000x. So it's better to have the chance to reach up to 300,000x with 20 cent stakes than to get a maximum of 5, 10, or 20,000 euros with a 1 euro stake.