Your suggested point of view is very unconventional, but I think it may be good to stick with the very basic truth—gambling will never be a source of wealth so funding the poor by betting is a utopia and thus quite a dangerous approach.

I'd say what you call the "evil" resides within people; it is not present in the outer world. The world is just people's playground.

I don't know if my addition will be relevant, but I

drew attention to the diversity of titles or

"degrees" of forum users. It looks like

magical Order. As far as I understand, "Junior Adept"

(who successfully passed the exam) would be able to play very well

in the casino. After all, he had mastered the secret techniques of getting

information, and most importantly, felt the Divine presence

within myself after months of exercise and rituals.

By increasing the level of spirituality, one can become an EXAMPLE, like a miracle worker... A miracle is not only a glorification and confirmation, but also an achievable milestone for those who are walking

along the way. Winning here is a material incentive to work on yourself, a real test, an exam, a level check...

Losing then is not a problem, but supporting something important and useful

process and donation.

Obviously, not everyone will be inspired, and few will succeed.

It will depend on the quality of teaching. A considerable amount of time of "PERSONAL FEAT" and accumulation of experience is necessary beforehand.

If the rituals of Christian orders seem too

removed from Scripture, one can recall the special, spiritually filled breath of the Methodists (Methodism),

"smart prayer" of the Orthodox, about "Spiritual exercises"

from I. Loyola... We are talking about what is legitimate and useful

complement without negation. For example, some Judaists

consider the study of Torah to be a general elementary school,

Talmud is the high school, and Kabbalah is the higher education.

Gambling With Eternity deserves a lot of praise.

It is certainly interesting to read.

But in the general information field it is strictly imposed

and the hypocritical "casino concept" wins, or worse,

from the scammers. All these vulgar pseudo-truths about the game do not benefit the real player. I could expose

and refute dozens of such supposedly "unshakable postulates". But for now, what is imposed on the players is winning

schizophrenic worldview. A hundred years ago this

looked funny and innocent in numerous books

French and then German authors.

Weekly Update: I have finally switched from adding rough drafts to making better and more refined articles. I started with the Randomness and Statistics article.

I am quickly learning that better articles take considerably longer to make than drafts. This one is improved, but not finished. In the future, I will leave an update as I actually finish each article.

The reasoning in the new article is interesting, sincere and independent. And knowledgeable: for example,

Henri Poincaré wrote in his book "Science et methode" about

randomness for a very simplified roulette:

"Let's imagine a needle that rotates on a spire in the center of a dial divided into one hundred sectors, alternately red and black..."

Who cares about the casino edge?

For the casino itself, to:

1. Do not suffer losses when the player bets evenly on everything

possible outcomes. This is ensured by the rules and the size of the payouts.

2. Have a convenient justification for casino revenue. However, studies have shown that the difference between the receipt of

and cash payments at the cash desks from 20% to 40%. And not 2 or 5%.

(Dean Radin, Kurt von Haller...)

So we're talking about multiple players, spins, hands, tables, and large periods of time. Yes, "edge" is one of the foundations of casino income.

If a player wins by chance, it is due to dispersion. Or by applying the true METHOD. Often a long game

undesirable.

As an example of the secondary importance of advantage

casino I will indicate the case of my systematic winnings

in a scratch lottery with its RTP exceeded by only 50%.

This lottery was simply convenient and, so to speak, "vulnerable"

for the extrasensory method.

Another paradox is successful bets on the "unfavorable" Tie in Baccarat.

"Gambler's fallacy" is a mistake,

only if the bet did not win. And if it did win, then the player

no longer a blockhead, but a smart and handsome guy. And it doesn't matter that he's there

thought or talked about red and black.

If you like it, I can continue.

I'll add a few words about probability theory specifically for

player. On the last page of the topic "Tips for Beginners: What advice would you give to a newbie in gambling?"

I briefly described how to find out:

1. The effectiveness of the game method,

(whether the case is defeated).

2. Does the wheel have a bias?

(flaws, bias).

3. Is the roulette missing?

bets?

If it works, I'll try to attach universal ones.

tables.

There are websites on the web with programs that test foresight and impact online.