Hello Cule21, nice to meet you!
My name is Matej, and I will be assisting you with this case. I'll do my best to help you resolve this issue as soon as possible. I have read through the e-mails you have provided, and it seems like the responsible gambling issue has been mishandled by the casino. However, I have tried to communicate with this casino in the past, and they never responded.
I’d like to invite a representative of TikiTaka Casino to join the conversation and participate in the investigation of this case as well. Could you possibly provide additional information regarding the issue with self-exclusion and clarify the situation? How is it possible to reopen an account of someone who just days prior stated having gambling addiction? From the evidence provided by the player this was very unfortunate turn of events, and after 15th April, the account should not have been re-opened ever.
Could you please close the account again, mark it as "closed due to gambling addiction, do not re-open ever" and confirm it in this thread?
Moreover, upon the account closure on the 15th April, all the outstanding bets should have been voided, and any remaining balance returned to the player. Unless you can provide us with any relevant evidence stating otherwise, the proper course of action would be to refund the player with whatever balance there was on 15th April upon account closure (including returned wagers from any outstanding bets) and any other subsequent deposit made by the player since the account re-opening (minus any withdrawals and winnings that have occurred in the meantime). Please, let us know how do you see this situation and if you agree with the above, or can suggest different resolution.
Thank you for your patience and cooperation in advance.
Hello Cule21, nice to meet you!
My name is Matej, and I will be assisting you with this case. I'll do my best to help you resolve this issue as soon as possible. I have read through the e-mails you have provided, and it seems like the responsible gambling issue has been mishandled by the casino. However, I have tried to communicate with this casino in the past, and they never responded.
I’d like to invite a representative of TikiTaka Casino to join the conversation and participate in the investigation of this case as well. Could you possibly provide additional information regarding the issue with self-exclusion and clarify the situation? How is it possible to reopen an account of someone who just days prior stated having gambling addiction? From the evidence provided by the player this was very unfortunate turn of events, and after 15th April, the account should not have been re-opened ever.
Could you please close the account again, mark it as "closed due to gambling addiction, do not re-open ever" and confirm it in this thread?
Moreover, upon the account closure on the 15th April, all the outstanding bets should have been voided, and any remaining balance returned to the player. Unless you can provide us with any relevant evidence stating otherwise, the proper course of action would be to refund the player with whatever balance there was on 15th April upon account closure (including returned wagers from any outstanding bets) and any other subsequent deposit made by the player since the account re-opening (minus any withdrawals and winnings that have occurred in the meantime). Please, let us know how do you see this situation and if you agree with the above, or can suggest different resolution.
Thank you for your patience and cooperation in advance.