On June 17, 2025, I deposited 505.97980139 DOGE and received the "1st Deposit bonus," a 100% match bonus accompanied by a 40x wagering requirement. To fulfill this wagering requirement, I played various casino games, primarily blackjack. Throughout this gaming session, a graphical progress bar representing my wagering fulfillment gradually filled up until it indicated completion, clearly illustrating that I had successfully met the requisite wagering conditions.
On June 18, 2025, I initiated a withdrawal of 2,000 DOGE from my account. However, as of June 21, the withdrawal had still not arrived. Upon logging into my casino account to investigate, I discovered that the withdrawal had been reversed and that all my winnings had been seized by the casino.
Immediately following this discovery, I contacted customer support to clarify the situation. Customer support informed me that my winnings had been seized due to my engagement in live casino games with an active bonus in place. However, I have not played any live casino games at any point during my sessions.
Furthermore, upon examining the casino's Terms and Conditions, Bonus Terms, and the specific terms related to the 1st Deposit bonus, I found no provision explicitly prohibiting live game play while utilizing an active bonus. Contrary to their explanation, the Bonus Terms directly state, "For all table games, live dealer games, classic slots, and video poker, 5% of a Player’s stake contributes towards the wagering requirement," clearly implying that live and table games may be permitted and can count, albeit partially, towards turnover.
During subsequent exchanges, the casino's customer support acknowledged that my play history consisted solely of non-live blackjack games. Still, they insisted these games were "considered as live games" and referred me back to the Bonus Terms. However, the referenced Bonus Terms explicitly list certain restricted games, and none of the games I participated in appear among those restricted titles.
Customer support also referred me to a provision stating, "Other games that are not mentioned above but have inside a bonus mechanic or can be high-volatility games can also be excluded from bonus wagering." Nonetheless, the blackjack games I played contain no internal bonus mechanics, nor do they possess particularly high volatility. Moreover, this provision is ambiguous, making it impossible for players to recognize beforehand which games the casino might consider falling under these vague categories.
Typically, if certain games are disallowed during bonus wagering, casinos clearly prohibit access to those games with active bonuses or simply exclude bets on them from contributing to wagering requirements. In this scenario, the casino allowed me to play the blackjack games and even displayed wagering progress on them.
Conclusively, it is unreasonable to seize my winnings due to the factual inaccuracies presented by the support team and vague, ambiguous bonus terms. Therefore, I am claiming my rightful winnings totaling 4,185.16229861 DOGE, currently being withheld by the casino.
I can provide the email correspondence with customer support upon request, as current attachment limits prevent including additional files within the submitted complaint form.
On June 17, 2025, I deposited 505.97980139 DOGE and received the "1st Deposit bonus," a 100% match bonus accompanied by a 40x wagering requirement. To fulfill this wagering requirement, I played various casino games, primarily blackjack. Throughout this gaming session, a graphical progress bar representing my wagering fulfillment gradually filled up until it indicated completion, clearly illustrating that I had successfully met the requisite wagering conditions.
On June 18, 2025, I initiated a withdrawal of 2,000 DOGE from my account. However, as of June 21, the withdrawal had still not arrived. Upon logging into my casino account to investigate, I discovered that the withdrawal had been reversed and that all my winnings had been seized by the casino.
Immediately following this discovery, I contacted customer support to clarify the situation. Customer support informed me that my winnings had been seized due to my engagement in live casino games with an active bonus in place. However, I have not played any live casino games at any point during my sessions.
Furthermore, upon examining the casino's Terms and Conditions, Bonus Terms, and the specific terms related to the 1st Deposit bonus, I found no provision explicitly prohibiting live game play while utilizing an active bonus. Contrary to their explanation, the Bonus Terms directly state, "For all table games, live dealer games, classic slots, and video poker, 5% of a Player’s stake contributes towards the wagering requirement," clearly implying that live and table games may be permitted and can count, albeit partially, towards turnover.
During subsequent exchanges, the casino's customer support acknowledged that my play history consisted solely of non-live blackjack games. Still, they insisted these games were "considered as live games" and referred me back to the Bonus Terms. However, the referenced Bonus Terms explicitly list certain restricted games, and none of the games I participated in appear among those restricted titles.
Customer support also referred me to a provision stating, "Other games that are not mentioned above but have inside a bonus mechanic or can be high-volatility games can also be excluded from bonus wagering." Nonetheless, the blackjack games I played contain no internal bonus mechanics, nor do they possess particularly high volatility. Moreover, this provision is ambiguous, making it impossible for players to recognize beforehand which games the casino might consider falling under these vague categories.
Typically, if certain games are disallowed during bonus wagering, casinos clearly prohibit access to those games with active bonuses or simply exclude bets on them from contributing to wagering requirements. In this scenario, the casino allowed me to play the blackjack games and even displayed wagering progress on them.
Conclusively, it is unreasonable to seize my winnings due to the factual inaccuracies presented by the support team and vague, ambiguous bonus terms. Therefore, I am claiming my rightful winnings totaling 4,185.16229861 DOGE, currently being withheld by the casino.
I can provide the email correspondence with customer support upon request, as current attachment limits prevent including additional files within the submitted complaint form.