Hei. Kiitos kysymyksest?si. Yrit?n selitt?? sit? sinulle hieman, jos et v?lit?.
Kasinon lisenssi on vain yksi monista n?k?kohdista, jotka otamme huomioon arvioita tehdess?mme ja t?ss? tapauksessa kasinon lisenssitila p?ivitettiin vasta viime viikolla, ja t?st? p?iv?st? l?htien voit n?hd? turvallisuusindeksin hieman laskeneen (9, 6 -> 8,9).
Ymm?rr?n kuitenkin ep?ilyksesi siit?, ett? kasinot, jotka toimivat ilman lisenssi?, eiv?t yleens? ole kovin hyvi?, mutta t?m? ei v?ltt?m?tt? tarkoita, etteik? kasinoa voisi olla ilman lisenssi?, joka on todella hyv?. Niin kauan kuin kasinot kohtelevat pelaajia oikeudenmukaisesti, maksavat heid?n voittonsa ja heill? ei ole valituksia pelaajilta, voimme j??d? sen taakse, ett? heill? ei ole lisenssi?, vaikka tietysti toivoisimmekin, ett? heill? olisi sellainen.
Haluaisin lainata pienen osan artikkelistamme, joka k?sittelee kasinoiden arvioimista. Olet tervetullut tutustumaan t?h?n.
"On my?s t?rke?? huomata, ett? jokainen tapaus k?sitell??n erikseen. Joskus kasinolla on p?tev? syy tehd? jotain, jota yleens? pid?mme ep?reiluna (esim. voittorajat s??nn?sten vuoksi, toimiminen ilman lisenssi? nimett?m?n pelaamisen vuoksi jne.) N?iss? tapauksissa kommunikoimme kasinon kanssa varmistaaksemme, ett? olemme oikeudenmukaisia paitsi pelaajia, my?s kasinoita kohtaan."
Se, ett? CSGOPolygon Casino toimii ilman lisenssi?, heijastuu itse asiassa sen turvallisuusindeksiss?, mutta on olemassa muita tekij?it?, jotka tukevat t?t? tilannetta.
T?ss? tapauksessa emme ole havainneet t?m?n kasinon k?ytt?ehdoista ep?reiluja s??nt?j?, emmek? ole ratkaisemattomia valituksia, jotka alentaisivat turvallisuusindeksi?, tai muita ep?reiluja tekij?it?. Ottaen huomioon sen tosiasian, ett? kasino n?ytt?? toimineen jo melko pitk??n eik? ole olemassa mit??n vihjeit?, jotka heikent?isiv?t sen mainetta yleisesti, voimme olettaa, ett? korkea turvallisuusindeksi on kohdallaan.
Oletko kokeillut t?t? kasinoa henkil?kohtaisesti, jos kyll?, mit? pelej? pelasit ja mik? on kokemuksesi yleisesti?
Hello. Thank you for your question. Let me try to explain it a bit to you if you don't mind.
License of a casino is only one of many aspects we take into consideration, when making a review and in this particular case, the casino's license status was updated just last week, and as of today you can see the safety index slightly decreased (9,6 -> 8,9).
I can understand your doubts though, that casinos who operate without any license are usually not very good, but this does not necessarily mean, that there can't be a casino without license that is actually good. As long as casinos treat players fairly, pay out their winnings and do not have complaints from players, we can get behind the fact that they do not have any license, although of course we'd prefer if they would have one.
I'd like to quote a small part of our article on how do we review casinos, which you are welcomed to take a look at here.
"Also, it's important to note that each case is considered separately. Sometimes, the casino has a valid reason for doing something we usually find unfair (e.g. having win limits because of regulations, operating without a license because of running anonymously, etc.). In these cases, we communicate with the casino to make sure we are being fair not only to players, but also to casinos."
The fact that CSGOPolygon Casino operates without any license is actually reflected in its safety index, however there are other factors which counterweight this situation.
In this case, we have not found any unfair rules in T&Cs of this casino and there are no unresolved complaints, which would decrease the safety index, nor any other unfair factors. Considering the fact that the casino seems to be operating for quite a long time now and there aren't any hints that would hinder its reputation in general, we may assume the high safety index is on point.
Have you tried this casino personally, if yes what games did you play and what is your experience overall?
Automaattinen k??nn?s: