Olenko siis oikeassa olettaessani, ett? Softswiss v?itt?? rikkoneen k?ytt?ehtoja?
Jos n?in on, n?ytt?? silt?, ett? Antillephone (pit?isik? meid?nkin kutsua niit? Softswissiksi?) on itse asiassa kasinon puolella v?litt?m?ll? sinulle mink? tahansa typer?n s??nn?n, jonka he v?itt?v?t sinun rikkoneen. (joka voi olla my?s maksimivoiton s??nt?).
Joka tapauksessa, kun yksi yritys omistaa alustan, operaattorit, kasinot, palveluntarjoajat, pelit, palvelimet, tyt?ryhti?t JA lisensointielimen... p??dyt t?llaiseen tilanteeseen.
DAMA/Direx/Hollycorn/N1 - BGaming/Booongo/Booming Games/3OAKS/Playson - Antillephone NV - Softswiss ---> Putin
PS Jos lopetan yht?kki? t?m?n sivuston aktiivisen j?senen, tied?t sen johtuvan siit?, ett? putosin vahingossa kuoliaaksi korkean rakennuksen ylimm?st? kerroksesta - mellakkalasivahvisteisen ikkunan l?pi, voin lis?t? - vaikka humalassa ja aiheuttanut meteli?... kaikki sen j?lkeen, kun oli nauttinut cocktailin opiaatteihin perustuvista kipul??kkeist?, arseenista ja syanidia.
So am I correct in assuming Softswiss is alleging breach of T&C?
If that's the case, it appears that Antillephone (should we maybe call them Softswiss, too?), with its non-ruling, is in effect taking the side of the casino by forwarding to you whatever stupid rule they allege that you've broken (which could also be a max win rule).
Either way, when one company owns the platform, operators, casinos, providers, games, servers, affiliates AND the licensing body.. you end up in this type of situation.
DAMA/Direx/Hollycorn/N1 - BGaming/Booongo/Booming Games/3OAKS/Playson - Antillephone NV - Softswiss ---> Putin
P.S. If I suddenly stop being an active member of this site, you'll know it's because I accidentally fell to my death from the top floor of a high-rise building - through a riot-glass-reinforced window, I might add - while drunk and causing a commotion.. all after consuming a cocktail of opiate-based painkillers, arsenic and cyanide.
Automaattinen k??nn?s: