I opened an account at kinghills 8-9 months ago, the first KYC was carried out a few days after opening the account, i.e. 8-9 months ago.
I have made deposits and withdraws before and there were no problems as you can see in the screenshot that I added to the attachment.
I haven't played there for the last half a year, but on 02.05.2025 I made a crypto deposit of 147.92 e
I won 1766 euros, and things started going wrong, they didn't accept my withdraw and came up with new verifications, they wanted me to send Proof of Deposit to them, I did it, they accepted and verified my account.
then after a few days after my questions on live chat about the payout, I got some strange questionnaire about the source of wealth, and I had to send documents confirming the origin of the funds (I don't really know what they mean)
Throughout the entire existence of the account I have deposited only 1226.95e however, I withdrew 2491e from them,
Currently there are 1766e on my account.
they launched the source of funds after a deposit of 150e, it sounds absurd, especially since the last transactions on my account with processed withdrawals for about 2000e.
I also sent them a screenshot of a withdrawal confirmation from other gambling company betco.ag for $4100 from March, which was sent to the same eth address I used to make the deposit to kinghills.
however they rejected it on live chat it's hard to find out what they expect, do I have to prove the origin of 150e? when they paid me much more earlier?
it is obvious to me that this is just about making KYC more difficult, inventing new verification methods every now and then is the best example of this.
confirmation of the source of funds when my deposits for the last half a year were around 150e, but they themselves withdraw me more, I also have withdrawal confirmations from other gambling sites,
their live chat guy wrote that as a licensed casino in MGA they are obliged to verify the source of funds, that's strange I checked and all I see there is some worthless Curacao license, not the Maltese MGA.
So I don't understand at all what they expect to prove the funds in the huge amount of 150e that I have deposited in the last half a year.
I opened an account at kinghills 8-9 months ago, the first KYC was carried out a few days after opening the account, i.e. 8-9 months ago.
I have made deposits and withdraws before and there were no problems as you can see in the screenshot that I added to the attachment.
I haven't played there for the last half a year, but on 02.05.2025 I made a crypto deposit of 147.92 e
I won 1766 euros, and things started going wrong, they didn't accept my withdraw and came up with new verifications, they wanted me to send Proof of Deposit to them, I did it, they accepted and verified my account.
then after a few days after my questions on live chat about the payout, I got some strange questionnaire about the source of wealth, and I had to send documents confirming the origin of the funds (I don't really know what they mean)
Throughout the entire existence of the account I have deposited only 1226.95e however, I withdrew 2491e from them,
Currently there are 1766e on my account.
they launched the source of funds after a deposit of 150e, it sounds absurd, especially since the last transactions on my account with processed withdrawals for about 2000e.
I also sent them a screenshot of a withdrawal confirmation from other gambling company betco.ag for $4100 from March, which was sent to the same eth address I used to make the deposit to kinghills.
however they rejected it on live chat it's hard to find out what they expect, do I have to prove the origin of 150e? when they paid me much more earlier?
it is obvious to me that this is just about making KYC more difficult, inventing new verification methods every now and then is the best example of this.
confirmation of the source of funds when my deposits for the last half a year were around 150e, but they themselves withdraw me more, I also have withdrawal confirmations from other gambling sites,
their live chat guy wrote that as a licensed casino in MGA they are obliged to verify the source of funds, that's strange I checked and all I see there is some worthless Curacao license, not the Maltese MGA.
So I don't understand at all what they expect to prove the funds in the huge amount of 150e that I have deposited in the last half a year.