Dear Peter,
Thank you for continuing to follow up on my complaint.
I’ve carefully read RakeBit’s most recent response, and I must say it is deeply unsatisfying — not only in content, but also in logic.
Their reply simply restates general terms and conditions, without presenting any specific evidence or even explaining what exactly I did wrong. This approach feels like telling someone:
"You’re going to jail because laws exist. Here’s a book of laws — find your crime yourself."
Dear Peter,
Thank you for continuing to follow up on my complaint.
I’ve carefully read RakeBit’s most recent response, and I must say it is deeply unsatisfying — not only in content, but also in logic.
Their reply simply restates general terms and conditions, without presenting any specific evidence or even explaining what exactly I did wrong. This approach feels like telling someone:
"You’re going to jail because laws exist. Here’s a book of laws — find your crime yourself."
This is a logical fallacy and a deflection. If I truly committed any wrongdoing, they should be able to say clearly:
What exactly was suspicious?
What action triggered the ban?
When did it happen and how?
Instead, they hide behind vague policy language — which, in fact, only proves that they have no actual case or evidence. It feels like they are looking for a reason after taking the money.
I was hoping for some transparency and basic respect as a customer. But their refusal to explain anything further not only violates fairness, it reveals their intention to shut the door without accountability.
Peter, I deeply appreciate your support and time — but I must ask you honestly:
Based on your experience, how likely is it that this case will be resolved in my favor?
I understand you may not control their decision, but your insight would help me set my expectations and decide how far I need to take this publicly and legally.
Thank you again for your work and fairness.
Sincerely,
Dear Peter,
Thank you for continuing to follow up on my complaint.
I’ve carefully read RakeBit’s most recent response, and I must say it is deeply unsatisfying — not only in content, but also in logic.
Their reply simply restates general terms and conditions, without presenting any specific evidence or even explaining what exactly I did wrong. This approach feels like telling someone:
"You’re going to jail because laws exist. Here’s a book of laws — find your crime yourself."
Dear Peter,
Thank you for continuing to follow up on my complaint.
I’ve carefully read RakeBit’s most recent response, and I must say it is deeply unsatisfying — not only in content, but also in logic.
Their reply simply restates general terms and conditions, without presenting any specific evidence or even explaining what exactly I did wrong. This approach feels like telling someone:
"You’re going to jail because laws exist. Here’s a book of laws — find your crime yourself."
This is a logical fallacy and a deflection. If I truly committed any wrongdoing, they should be able to say clearly:
What exactly was suspicious?
What action triggered the ban?
When did it happen and how?
Instead, they hide behind vague policy language — which, in fact, only proves that they have no actual case or evidence. It feels like they are looking for a reason after taking the money.
I was hoping for some transparency and basic respect as a customer. But their refusal to explain anything further not only violates fairness, it reveals their intention to shut the door without accountability.
Peter, I deeply appreciate your support and time — but I must ask you honestly:
Based on your experience, how likely is it that this case will be resolved in my favor?
I understand you may not control their decision, but your insight would help me set my expectations and decide how far I need to take this publicly and legally.
Thank you again for your work and fairness.
Sincerely,