EOD Code SRL, operator of Slotmonster, engages in problematic practices.
Due to my gambling addiction, I requested a self-exclusion at Slotmonster.com on March 11, 2025, which the operator confirmed and acknowledged.
Despite this, on April 9, 2025, I — on my own initiative and in a vulnerable state — opened a new account simply by using a different email address. This is how I discovered that the operator easily allows the creation of a new account even if a self-exclusion request is already in place.
Here is the pattern I identified:
The account, not the player, is excluded: Only the originally excluded account is disabled. When registering a new account, there is no verification to check whether the player has already requested a self-exclusion. With the same personal details (name, date of birth, etc.), a new account can be easily created — all you need is a different email address.
Unrestricted deposits and play are still possible: Despite the active self-exclusion, I was able to deposit money and gamble again. The operator did not take any effective measures to permanently block excluded players from accessing the site.
Payouts are blocked: Only when a payout request is made does the operator perform a more thorough identity check. If it is then discovered that a self-exclusion is in place, the payout is denied. The previously deposited funds are lost.
One-sided advantage for the operator: This practice allows the operator to continue accepting deposits while refusing to pay out winnings. This approach exploits vulnerable players suffering from gambling addiction.
Conclusion: Based on the current situation, I do not expect to recover my deposited funds, as I technically opened a new account myself. Nevertheless, it is important to raise awareness of this practice, as it clearly violates the principles of responsible gambling and established player protection standards.
I hope this information helps other players to stay cautious.
EOD Code SRL, operator of Slotmonster, engages in problematic practices.
Due to my gambling addiction, I requested a self-exclusion at Slotmonster.com on March 11, 2025, which the operator confirmed and acknowledged.
Despite this, on April 9, 2025, I — on my own initiative and in a vulnerable state — opened a new account simply by using a different email address. This is how I discovered that the operator easily allows the creation of a new account even if a self-exclusion request is already in place.
Here is the pattern I identified:
The account, not the player, is excluded: Only the originally excluded account is disabled. When registering a new account, there is no verification to check whether the player has already requested a self-exclusion. With the same personal details (name, date of birth, etc.), a new account can be easily created — all you need is a different email address.
Unrestricted deposits and play are still possible: Despite the active self-exclusion, I was able to deposit money and gamble again. The operator did not take any effective measures to permanently block excluded players from accessing the site.
Payouts are blocked: Only when a payout request is made does the operator perform a more thorough identity check. If it is then discovered that a self-exclusion is in place, the payout is denied. The previously deposited funds are lost.
One-sided advantage for the operator: This practice allows the operator to continue accepting deposits while refusing to pay out winnings. This approach exploits vulnerable players suffering from gambling addiction.
Conclusion: Based on the current situation, I do not expect to recover my deposited funds, as I technically opened a new account myself. Nevertheless, it is important to raise awareness of this practice, as it clearly violates the principles of responsible gambling and established player protection standards.
I hope this information helps other players to stay cautious.