Ei en ole. Luotin tavallaan kasinogurun luokitukseen pelatessani t??ll?. Summa ei ole omiin mittasuhteisiini n?hden suuri, mutta t?llainen huijaaminen on ?rsytt?v?? ja siit? pit?? kertoa muille.
MGA-valitus on joskus tuottanut jotain, mutta tallettaminen Curacaolle on aina riski.
Heille on tyypillist? luoda s??nt?j?, joita he eiv?t tietenk??n itse asiassa noudata, kun asiat menev?t heid?n edukseen. Mutta jos joku onnistuu voittamaan, s??nt?j? tuodaan esille.
T?ss? on nyt koomisin asia, ett? vedonly?ntihistoria n?ytt?? kuinka Lost-vetoni ovat olleet heille ok ja rahat ovat olleet voimassa, mutta sitten kaikki Voitetut vedot on hyl?tty ja vain alkuper?inen veto on palautettu.
Nyt he ehdottivat, ett? tekisin valituksen. No, et voi arvata kenelle n?m? on tehty... Aivan oikein, itselleen, mutta vain toiseen s?hk?postiosoitteeseen.
No. I'm not. I kind of trusted the rating of the casino guru when I played here. The amount is not big by my standards, but this kind of cheating is annoying and you have to tell others about it.
The MGA complaint has sometimes yielded something, but depositing in Curacao is always a risk.
It is typical for them to create rules which of course they don't actually follow when things go in their favor. But if someone manages to win, then the rules will be brought up.
Now here is the most comical thing that the bet history shows how my Lost bets have been ok for them and the money has been valid, but then all the Won bets have been rejected and only the original bet has been returned.
Now they suggested that I file a complaint. Well, you can't guess who these are made for... That's right, for themselves, but only to another email address.
Automaattinen k??nn?s: