Nej det ?r jag inte. Jag litade p? casinoguruns betyg n?r jag spelade h?r. Beloppet ?r inte stort med mina m?tt m?tt, men den h?r typen av fusk ?r irriterande och du m?ste ber?tta f?r andra om det.
MGA-klagom?let har ibland gett n?got, men att deponera p? Curacao ?r alltid en risk.
Det ?r typiskt f?r dem att skapa regler som de f?rst?s inte faktiskt f?ljer n?r det g?r till deras f?rdel. Men om n?gon lyckas vinna s? kommer reglerna att tas upp.
Nu ?r h?r det mest komiska att vadshistoriken visar hur mina f?rlorade spel har varit ok f?r dem och pengarna har varit giltiga, men sedan har alla vunna insatserna avvisats och bara den ursprungliga insatsen har returnerats.
Nu f?reslog de att jag skulle l?mna in ett klagom?l. Tja, du kan inte gissa vem dessa ?r gjorda f?r... Det st?mmer, f?r dem sj?lva, men bara till en annan e-postadress.
No. I'm not. I kind of trusted the rating of the casino guru when I played here. The amount is not big by my standards, but this kind of cheating is annoying and you have to tell others about it.
The MGA complaint has sometimes yielded something, but depositing in Curacao is always a risk.
It is typical for them to create rules which of course they don't actually follow when things go in their favor. But if someone manages to win, then the rules will be brought up.
Now here is the most comical thing that the bet history shows how my Lost bets have been ok for them and the money has been valid, but then all the Won bets have been rejected and only the original bet has been returned.
Now they suggested that I file a complaint. Well, you can't guess who these are made for... That's right, for themselves, but only to another email address.
Automatiskt ?versatt: