Voit aina toimittaa havaintosi s?hk?postitse tai suoraan kasinon ketjussa.
Sallikaa minun sanoa, ett? jotkut kasinot, joilla on eritt?in huono maine, ovat my?s eritt?in arvostettuja urheiluvedonly?ntisivustoina. Minusta se oli my?s eritt?in mielenkiintoista.
Luulen vain, ett? jokaisella pelaajalla voi olla erilainen maku ja hyvin erilaiset kokemukset kasinoista. Miten eritt?in hyv?maineinen kasino voi toisaalta saada paljon "huonoja" arvosteluja? Jotkut pelaajat eiv?t edes ymm?rr? s??nt?j?, joten he pit?v?t huonoja kasinoita melko mukavina, koska he olivat onnekkaita ja voittivat - sellaiset pelaajat eiv?t todellakaan v?lit? lisenssist? tai maineesta - kuten huomaan.
Ymm?rr?n huolesi ja kiit?n sinua siit?. Teen parhaani hyl?t?kseni jokaisen v??r?ksi l?yt?m?ni k?ytt?j?arvion, mutta minun on pidett?v? mieless?, ett? en voi tehd? sit? ilman asianmukaista syyt? ja vankkoja todisteita.
T?st? syyst? pid?mme yleiset mainepisteet erill??n k?ytt?jien arvosteluista.
You can always provide your findings via email or directly in the casino thread.
Allow me to say that some casinos with a very bad reputation are also very appreciated as sports betting sites, I found that very interesting too.
I just think that every player may have different tastes and very different experiences with casinos. How could a casino with a very good reputation receive tons of "bad" reviews, on the other hand? Some players even do not understand the rules hence they find bad casinos pretty nice because they were lucky and won - such players do not really care about license or reputation - as I find out.
I understand your concern and I thank you for that, I do my best to reject every user review I find false, but I have to keep in mind, that I can't do that without proper reason and solid evidence.
That is why we keep the overall reputation score separated from user reviews.