Heid?n on j?tett?v? joitain tietoja pois, koska he olisivat varmasti saaneet Wiselt? kirjeenvaihtoa riidan sulkemisesta tai tilins? sulkemisesta. My?s tavaran vastaanottamatta j?tt?misell? n?iss? kasinoissa on oikeastaan ??mink??nlaisia ??perusteita vain, jos on k?ytetty virheellist? omaa asiakaskeskusta, he ilmoittivat, etteiv?t tienneet k?ytetyst? omasta asiakaskeskuksesta mit??n, mik? saa minut uskomaan, ett? he ovat itse asiassa menneet eteenp?in kiistan kanssa. , he olisivat voineet tehd? sen laillista k?sittelij?? vastaan, joka on k?ytt?nyt oikeita MCC:it?, mik? korjaa minut, jos olen v??r?ss?. Onko he todenn?k?isesti hyl?nneet kiistan ja asettaneet CIFAS:n?
They have to be leaving some information out, as surely they would have received some correspondence from Wise in regards to the dispute being closed or their account being closed. Also the goods not received approach to these casinos only really has any sort of grounds if an incorrect MCC has been used, they stated they didn't know anything about the MCC used which leads me to believe if they have infact gone forward with a dispute, they could have done it against a legitimate processor who has used the correct MCCs, which correct me if i'm wrong, is probably where they would have rejected the dispute and placed a CIFAS?
Automaattinen k??nn?s: