Moraju da izostavljaju neke informacije, jer bi sigurno dobili neku korespondenciju od Vise-a u vezi sa zatvaranjem spora ili zatvaranjem njihovog naloga. Tako?e, roba koja nije primljena u pristup ovim kockarnicama ima bilo kakav osnov samo ako je kori??en neta?an MCC, oni su izjavili da ne znaju ni?ta o kori??enom MCC-u, ?to me navodi da verujem da su oni u stvari krenuli sa sporom , mogli su to da urade protiv legitimnog procesora koji je koristio ispravne MCC-ove, koji me ispravljaju ako gre?im, verovatno bi tamo odbili spor i postavili CIFAS?
They have to be leaving some information out, as surely they would have received some correspondence from Wise in regards to the dispute being closed or their account being closed. Also the goods not received approach to these casinos only really has any sort of grounds if an incorrect MCC has been used, they stated they didn't know anything about the MCC used which leads me to believe if they have infact gone forward with a dispute, they could have done it against a legitimate processor who has used the correct MCCs, which correct me if i'm wrong, is probably where they would have rejected the dispute and placed a CIFAS?
Automatski prevedeno: