No t?m? on turhaa. Taas olet v??ristellyt sanani. En kommentoi laillisuutta; Olen sanonut sen sinulle niin monta kertaa. Emme ole lakimiehi?; juuri t?m? lanka osoittaa, ett? t?lle k?yt?nn?lle ei ole yhten?ist? t?yt?nt??npanoa tai edes kentt??. ?l? ota minua mukaan t?h?n asiaan, jos haluat pysy? puolueettomana.
Sanoin, ett? kun pelaajat k?yttiv?t t?t? k?yt?nt?? saadakseen takaisinperinn?n vain siksi, ett? he menettiv?t rahat, se ei ollut reilua. Sit? kutsutaan riskitt?m?ksi uhkapelaamiseksi. Tekisik? he samoin, jos he voittaisivat?
T?ysin erilainen kuin riippuvainen pelaaja, jolla on aktiivisesti estetty rahapelien pankkitapahtumat, ja joka pystyy tallettamaan, koska kasino k?ytt?? t?t? k?yt?nt??.
Mielest?ni ero on ilmeinen ja selke? - keskin?iseen oikeudenmukaisuuteen keskittyen. Mik? valitettavasti ei tarkoita, ett? voisimme ottaa yhteytt? kasinoihin ja pyyt?? heit? kohteliaasti p??sem??n s??nnellyille markkinoille eri tavalla.
Miksi? Koska emme ole pelaajia, jotka kohtaavat n?it? ongelmia, ja kasinoilla ei ole mit??n syyt? keskustella kanssamme t?st? aiheesta. Meit? on pyydetty poistamaan t?m? viestiketju, kielt?m??n k?ytt?ji? antamasta vinkkej? ja k?sittelem??n aihetta, mutta emme ole tehneet niin. Koska t?m?n tilan j?tt?minen sinulle on tapamme auttaa sinua l?yt?m??n tien.
Suosittelen, ett? l?het?t lausuntosi kasinoille, ei minulle.
Siin? kaikki. En sanonut: "Mielest?ni on ep?reilua, ett? pelaaja kyseenalaistaa t?m?n laittoman toimenpiteen." Huono sanamuotosi viel? kerran.
Jos haluat edelleen manipuloida sanojani, olen valmis.
Well, this is pointless. Again you have twisted my words. I won't comment about legality; I have told you so for so many times. We are not lawyers; this very thread demonstrates a lack of a unified enforcement or even field for this practise. Please refrain from involving me in this matter if you prefer to remain impartial.
I said when players took advantage of this practice to get chargebacks just because they lost the money, it was not fair. It's called no-risk gambling. Would they do the same if they won?
Completely different from an addicted player with actively blocked banking transactions on gambling being able to deposit because the casino uses this practise.
In my opinion, the difference is obvious and clear - focused on mutual fairness. Which sadly does not mean we can reach out to casinos to ask them politely to enter regulated markets in a different way.
Why? Because we are not the players facing these issues and the casinos have no reason to talk with us about this subject. We have been asked to delete this thread, ban users for providing tips and get done with the subject, yet we have not done so. Because leaving you this space is our way to help you find the way.
I suggest you send your statements to casinos, not to me.
That's all. I did not say, "Oh I think its unfair that the player is questioning this illegal ransaction." Your poor wording once more.
If you still prefer to manipulate my words, I'm done with you.
Automaattinen k??nn?s: