Tja, det h?r ?r meningsl?st. ?terigen har du f?rvr?ngt mina ord. Jag kommer inte kommentera lagligheten; Jag har sagt det till dig s? m?nga g?nger. Vi ?r inte advokater; just den h?r tr?den visar p? bristen p? en enhetlig till?mpning eller till och med f?lt f?r denna praxis. V?nligen avst? fr?n att involvera mig i denna fr?ga om du f?redrar att f?rbli opartisk.
Jag sa n?r spelare utnyttjade denna praxis f?r att f? ?terkrav bara f?r att de f?rlorade pengarna, det var inte r?ttvist. Det kallas riskfritt spelande. Skulle de g?ra detsamma om de vann?
Helt annorlunda ?n att en beroende spelare med aktivt blockerade banktransaktioner p? spel kan s?tta in eftersom kasinot anv?nder sig av denna praxis.
Enligt min mening ?r skillnaden uppenbar och tydlig – fokuserad p? ?msesidig r?ttvisa. Vilket tyv?rr inte betyder att vi kan n? ut till kasinon och be dem artigt att g? in p? reglerade marknader p? ett annat s?tt.
Varf?r? Eftersom vi inte ?r spelarna som st?r inf?r dessa problem och kasinon har ingen anledning att prata med oss ??om detta ?mne. Vi har blivit ombedda att ta bort den h?r tr?den, f?rbjuda anv?ndare f?r att ge tips och bli klara med ?mnet, men vi har inte gjort det. F?r att l?mna dig det h?r utrymmet ?r v?rt s?tt att hj?lpa dig hitta v?gen.
Jag f?resl?r att du skickar dina uttalanden till kasinon, inte till mig.
Det ?r allt. Jag sa inte, "?h, jag tycker att det ?r or?ttvist att spelaren ifr?gas?tter denna olagliga ransaktion." Din d?liga formulering ?n en g?ng.
Om du fortfarande f?redrar att manipulera mina ord, ?r jag klar med dig.
Well, this is pointless. Again you have twisted my words. I won't comment about legality; I have told you so for so many times. We are not lawyers; this very thread demonstrates a lack of a unified enforcement or even field for this practise. Please refrain from involving me in this matter if you prefer to remain impartial.
I said when players took advantage of this practice to get chargebacks just because they lost the money, it was not fair. It's called no-risk gambling. Would they do the same if they won?
Completely different from an addicted player with actively blocked banking transactions on gambling being able to deposit because the casino uses this practise.
In my opinion, the difference is obvious and clear - focused on mutual fairness. Which sadly does not mean we can reach out to casinos to ask them politely to enter regulated markets in a different way.
Why? Because we are not the players facing these issues and the casinos have no reason to talk with us about this subject. We have been asked to delete this thread, ban users for providing tips and get done with the subject, yet we have not done so. Because leaving you this space is our way to help you find the way.
I suggest you send your statements to casinos, not to me.
That's all. I did not say, "Oh I think its unfair that the player is questioning this illegal ransaction." Your poor wording once more.
If you still prefer to manipulate my words, I'm done with you.
Automatiskt ?versatt: