Mislim da je to ne?to ?to verovatno uop?te nismo uradili. Mo?da postoje drugi pokazatelji za?to neki drugi sajtovi za recenzije prikazuju druga?ije ocene. Mo?da postoji ne?to druga?ije sa ?ime se mo?da ne sla?emo u skladu sa na?im vrednostima, pa to radimo na osnovu sebe i uvek se trudimo da budemo ?to objektivniji.
Mogu da smislim primer da bi neki drugi sajt mogao to da uradi na bazi naknade i da kazino do?e na vrh ili tako ne?to. Tako da to definitivno ne bi bilo ispravno.
Ali uvek mogu da preporu?im proveru nekoliko izvora, korisni?kih recenzija, ?albi i upore?ivanje. Ako se neke stvari poklapaju, onda verovatno nije slu?ajnost, i naravno vi?e izvora zna?i vi?e informacija, tako sam nau?io da proveravam bilo ?ta. Naravno, najbolje je ako su izvori relevantni i ne tra?imo stvari o kazinima u ba?tovanskim ?asopisima, na primer. ??
I think that's something we probably didn't do at all. Maybe there are other indicators why some other review sites show different scores. Maybe there's something different that we might not agree with according to our values, so we do it based on ourselves and we always try to be as objective as possible.
I can think of an example that some other site could do it on a fee basis and get the casino to the top or something. So that would definitely not be right.
But I can always recommend to check several sources, user reviews, complaints and compare. If some things match, then it's probably not a coincidence, and of course more sources means more information, that's how I've learned to do it with verifying anything. Of course, it's best if the sources are relevant and we don't look for things about casinos in a gardening magazine, for example. ??
Automatski prevedeno: