Hej tamo.
Da budem iskren, ovo je uobi?ajeno pogre?no tuma?enje koncepta sajma. Primer prodava?a je tako?e neprecizan jer pravila koja ste prihvatili prilikom registracije naloga u kazinu navode koje su zemlje zabranjene. Rekao bih da nema tog dogovora ako neko ide da kupuje cigarete.
Kao ?to je navedeno u ?albi, u idealnom slu?aju ne biste mogli ni da posetite veb lokaciju. ?tavi?e, kazino nije znao za va?e poreklo jer je verifikacija jedini metod koji se koristi za potvrdu zemlje prebivali?ta igra?a.
Priznajemo da je ovo veoma negativno korisni?ko iskustvo, ali ne mo?emo smatrati kazino odgovornim za to. Ve?ina igra?a koji smatraju da bi trebalo da dobiju nadoknadu za ono ?to su s pravom izgubili obi?no tra?e pravni savet. Da budemo iskreni, na? stav ne podr?ava ideju retroaktivnog refundiranja gubitaka u ovim situacijama jer bi to bilo nepravedno prema drugim igra?ima i tako?e podr?ava ideju da igranje bez rizika od gubitka ne vodi ka sigurnijim navikama kockanja.
Ali vidim za?to se va?e gledi?te razlikuje od na?eg. Nisam siguran da li bi iskreno obja?njenje to moglo u?initi druga?ijim.
Hey there.
To be honest, this is a common misinterpretation of the fair concept. The shopkeeper example is also imprecise because the rules you accepted when registering your account at the casino specified which countries were prohibited. I would say that there is no such agreement if someone goes to buy cigarettes.
As stated in the complaint, ideally you would not even be able to visit the website. Furthermore, the casino was unaware of your origins because the verification is the only method used to confirm a player's country of residence.
We acknowledge that this is a very negative user experience, but we cannot hold the casino accountable for it. Most players who feel they should be compensated for what they have rightfully lost typically seek legal advice. To be honest, our stance does not support the idea of retroactively refunding losses in these situations because that would be unfair to other players and it also supports the idea that playing without the risk of losing is not conducive to safer gambling habits.
I can see why your viewpoint is different from ours, though. I am not sure if an honest explanation could make that different.