Zdravo Nik!
Rekao bih, sasvim standardna situacija, ali naravno uvek zavisi od namera.
Mnoga kazina koriste preslikane stranice—drugi URL da bi korisniku predstavili ?eljenu odredi?nu stranicu. Da. Uop?teno govore?i, to je na?in da se osigura da ?e igra?i iz odre?enih zemalja videti poseban sadr?aj ili da ne?e videti sadr?aj dostupan za ostatak sveta – uklju?uju?i licence, uslove i igre.
Sve dok URL vodi do istog kazina i sve dok svako ogledalo prikazuje drugu licencu, pod pretpostavkom da su te licence va?e?e, ne bih o?ekivao da ?e svi URL-ovi biti registrovani kod svih dobavlja?a licenci.
Ima li smisla?
Na primer, kazino mo?da vi?e voli da poka?e igra?ima sa visoko regulisanih tr?i?ta svoju MGA licencu umesto An?uanske.
Dakle, zaista jo? jedna veoma interesantna tema. ?uo sam mnoga sasvim logi?na obja?njenja, ali kao ?to sam rekao, namere su najva?nije.
Hello Nick!
I'd say, quite standard situation, yet of course it always depends on the intentions.
Many casinos use mirror pages—a different URL to present the desired landing page to the user. Yep. Generally speaking, it is a way to ensure that players from specific countries will see special content or will not see the content available for the rest of the world—licenses, terms and games included.
As long as the URL leads to the same casino, and as long as each mirror shows a different license, assuming those licenses are valid, I would not expect all URLs to be registered under all license providers.
Does it make sense?
For example casino may prefer to show players from highly regulated markets its MGA license instead of Anjouan.
So, indeed another very interesting topic. I have heard many quite logic explanations, but as I said, the intentions are what matters the most.
Automatski prevedeno: