Recimo da poku?avam da pristupim legitimnom sajtu za kockanje sa sedi?tem u Sjedinjenim Dr?avama. ?im u?em na veb-sajt, automatski bivam blokiran zbog moje lokacije u Velikoj Britaniji, po?to njihove usluge nisu legalno dostupne korisnicima van njihove jurisdikcije. Ovo je standardna mera uskla?enosti.
S druge strane, operateri sa sedi?tem na Kurasau rutinski zaobilaze ova ograni?enja. Mo?ete pristupiti njihovim sajtovima bez ikakvih provera ili upozorenja od strane nadle?nih organa. Nema naznaka da njihove usluge nisu zakonski dozvoljene u Velikoj Britaniji.
Ve?ina potro?a?a nema na?ina da sazna da li je operater kockanja regulisan u Velikoj Britaniji ili ne. Zato je zakonska i eti?ka odgovornost operatera da od samog po?etka sprovede pravilno geoblokiranje kako ne bi obmanjivao korisnike i naveo ih da poveruju da je platforma legitimna ili licencirana u Velikoj Britaniji.
Let’s say I try to access a legitimate gambling site based in the United States. As soon as I enter the website, I’m automatically blocked due to my UK location, since their services aren’t legally available to users outside their jurisdiction. This is a standard compliance measure.
Cura?ao-based operators, on the other hand, routinely bypass these restrictions. You can access their sites without any jurisdictional checks or warnings. There’s no indication that their services are not legally permitted in the UK.
Most consumers have no way of knowing whether a gambling operator is UK-regulated or not. That’s why it’s the operator’s legal and ethical responsibility to implement proper geoblocking from the outset not to deceive users into believing the platform is legitimate or UK-licensed.
Automatski prevedeno: