Some casinos shows RTP below games ... but how can u tell if some casino (not from top 10-20) have RTP as they should?

Someone mention here earlier that play'n go and pragmatic are not reliable and let casinos fix their RTP,

I saw like 50 different providers on some casino and some of them i never heard of... still the question is how can u know what RTP is really behind them if they have questionable licence ?

i KNOW that some providers offers to casinos to chose % of RTP , but how can we know what casinos are those?

i Swear to god, in 5 years actively playing slots, i can't remember when i last time won anything on Microgaming or Netent games... Pragmatic maybe 50-50... Others idk, EGT/Greentube/Merkur/RTG/Betson/Habanero are ok i mostly play those.... i don't really play some ridiculous providers with silly art games or copy of other games from this providers with different pics and name..

Anyway, is there any way to we can be sure that casino have RTP that they should have?

Because im 100% sure that some games have 30-35% top of RTP...

You can't really tell if the stated RTP is correct or lower. You need to rely on the fact that casinos are regulated and checked by the licensing authority. If the casino operates without a license or has the license from a weak regulator (for example Costa Rica or I would even name Cura?ao), then you can't be sure at all. But it certainly doesn't mean that casinos that have for example Cura?ao license are bad. There are plenty of them that are actually great.

"But it certainly doesn't mean that casinos that have for example Cura?ao license are bad. There are plenty of them that are actually great "

Right. So there is no possible way to know anything..

The real problems are i think providers. not casinos.. and like u said doesn't matter what licence they had. It's just they offer different % of RTP to casinos..

Also mentioning Netent and Microgaming there are lot of ppl complaining about those If someone can confirm here that would be great

Anyway, still bugs me everytime i enter casino now since i found that ...It really push u away from playing slots anymore ...

When I'm thinking about it, it would be nice to have a list of providers that allow casinos to decrease RTP on their games, then if you're afraid that the RTP stated on the casino website isn't correct, you could simply avoid certain providers.

Thank you.

Players deserve to know what they playing

none of casinos (90% of them) don't even mention RTP enywhere.

RTP is based on the unreal bots testing the slots with the hard cold hand etc. playngo seems to keep it real

RTP of Pragmatic Play ( Sweet Bonanza 1000 ) so fake and they litterly let streamers win. But normal players have way less chance. I know so many streamers that won the max win. I know people including me that played easily 100x more games then them and nobody get's the max win. This is already for years and nobody investigate them that's the strange stuf.

If the casino doesnt list RTP in the information/settings of the game, then you know somethings "going on". You can sometimes find the information about RTP when you inspect network settings in your browser and check the information in the files being changed between you and the servers.

Streamers receive non-withdrawable cash from casinos to play, and they earn money through exposure. As for deposits – those are also funded by the partner casino. The casino simply transfers funds, which the streamer then deposits to make the whole scheme appear legitimate. On top of that, the payout ratio on such accounts is significantly increased.

The forum is full of regular players who have spun thousands of times – doesn’t anyone wonder why, in their case, the game feels like a wild rollercoaster, while a certain goofy showman streams for hours every day, bets €50-250 per spin, and consistently wins? Just like the others?

Don’t fall for it – everything looks flashy and exciting, streamers celebrate their wins and show proof of payouts. But it all serves one purpose, to entice viewers into depositing money. These visualized wins manipulate the psychology of unaware audiences, making them believe they can achieve the same "financial success". Reality, however, proves otherwise.

Maybe 5% of the streamers are real using own money and playing for real. Think about it, these people are streaming their own gameplay online, throwing around thousands, and then asking for $10 donations; something seems off about this whole endeavor, doesn't it? :D