Tim za ?albe uha Casino Guru-a,
Podnosim ovu formalnu ?albu protiv kazina Rolletto zbog ozbiljnih problema koji uklju?uju neodgovorne kockarske prakse, nepo?tovanje samoisklju?enja i nepravedno odbijanje povla?enja.
?? Rezime ?albe:
Prethodno sam se samoisklju?io iz Rolletto kazina koriste?i svoje puno ime i prezime i dokumenta. Me?utim, kasnije sam uspeo da registrujem drugi nalog koriste?i isto ime, imejl adresu i verifikovane li?ne dokumente. Kazino je u potpunosti verifikovao novi nalog, dozvolio mi da uplatim depozit i igram — ali je samo naveo samoisklju?enje kada sam poku?ao da podignem novac.
?? Vremenski okvir i detalji:
Datum samoisklju?enja: [Unesite datum ako je poznat]
Otvaranje novog naloga i depoziti: Roleto je dozvolio potpunu proveru li?nosti korisnika (KYC) i vi?estruke depozite tokom vremena, uprkos tome ?to je moj identitet ve? bio blokiran zbog isklju?enja.
Poku?aj povla?enja: Nakon zahteva za povla?enje, kazino je odbio zahtev i izjavio da nalog nikada nije trebalo da bude odobren zbog samoisklju?enja.
Zatra?io/la sam povra?aj svih depozita, posebno onih izvr?enih nakon datuma isklju?enja, i pristup oba KYC profila kako bih uporedio/la ?ta je podneto na oba naloga.
Uprkos vi?estrukim imejlovima, Roleto je odgovorio samo nejasnim, generi?kim odgovorima tvrde?i da je ?interna istraga" u toku bez ponu?enog vremenskog okvira ili re?enja.
?? Osnovi za ?albu:
Kr?enje obaveza odgovornog kockanja – Prihvatanje depozita od isklju?enog korisnika je u suprotnosti sa njihovim uslovima licenciranja prema Antillephone NV (Cura?ao 8048/JAZ).
Nepravedno boga?enje – Kazino je profitirao od depozita, dok je zakonite dobitke uskra?ivao tek nakon toga, bez namere da vrati sredstva.
Kr?enje dobre vere – Njihovo odbijanje da dostave jasne informacije ili rokove ukazuje na nevoljnost da se ovo re?i pravedno.
Manipulativna praksa – Dozvoljavanje depozita i kla?enja, ali blokiranje isplata kori??enjem selektivnog sprovo?enja samoisklju?enja kr?i poverenje i standarde fer kockanja.
?? Zahtevano re?enje:
Potpuni povra?aj svih depozita upla?enih nakon ?to je moj zahtev za samoisklju?enje prvobitno podnet.
Istraga njihovih propusta u KYC-u, ?to im je omogu?ilo da verifikuju isklju?enog korisnika.
Izjava kazina kojom se priznaju i re?avaju ovi propusti u uskla?enosti.
Hvala vam ?to ste pregledali moju ?albu. Drago mi je da dostavim kompletnu dokumentaciju, snimke ekrana, imejlove naloga i prepisku u prilog svom slu?aju.
ear Casino Guru Complaints Team,
I am submitting this formal complaint against Rolletto Casino due to serious issues involving irresponsible gambling practices, a failure to honor self-exclusion, and unjust denial of withdrawal.
?? Summary of Complaint:
I previously self-excluded from Rolletto Casino using my full legal name and documents. However, I was later able to register another account using the same name, email structure, and verified identity documents. The casino fully verified the new account, allowed me to deposit and play — yet only cited the self-exclusion when I attempted a withdrawal.
?? Timeline and Details:
Self-Exclusion Date: [Insert date if known]
New Account Creation & Deposits: Rolletto allowed full KYC and multiple deposits over time, despite my identity already being blocked due to exclusion.
Withdrawal Attempt: Upon requesting a withdrawal, the casino rejected the request and stated that the account should never have been allowed due to the self-exclusion.
I have requested a refund of all deposits, especially those made after the exclusion date, and access to both KYC profiles to compare what was submitted on both accounts.
Despite multiple emails, Rolletto has responded only with vague, generic replies claiming that an "internal investigation" is ongoing with no timeframe or resolution offered.
?? Complaint Grounds:
Violation of Responsible Gambling Obligations – Accepting deposits from an excluded user contradicts their licensing terms under Antillephone N.V. (Cura?ao 8048/JAZ).
Unjust Enrichment – The casino profited from deposits while denying rightful winnings only after the fact, with no intent to return funds.
Breach of Good Faith – Their refusal to provide clear updates or deadlines indicates an unwillingness to resolve this fairly.
Manipulative Practice – Allowing deposits and betting but blocking withdrawals using selective enforcement of self-exclusion violates trust and fair gambling standards.
?? Resolution Requested:
A full refund of all deposits made after my self-exclusion was originally submitted.
An investigation into their KYC failings, which allowed them to verify an excluded user.
A statement from the casino acknowledging and addressing these compliance failures.
Thank you for reviewing my complaint. I am happy to provide full documentation, screenshots, account emails, and correspondence to support my case.
Automatski prevedeno: