Dragi timu Thunderbolt kazina,
Hvala na obja?njenju. U redu, AML pravila su jasna. Me?utim, dozvolite mi da vam postavim nekoliko pitanja.
Koja su ta?no pravila primenjena u ovom slu?aju, molim vas? Gde mogu da ih na?em?
Da li sam dobro razumeo da na ra?unu igra?a jo? uvek postoji neiskori??eni depozit od 250 RUS?
Da li su ispunjeni uslovi za bonus kla?enje? Ako je odgovor da, pravilo o maksimalnom isplati/povla?enju je ve? primenjeno nakon konverzije dobitaka u saldo koji se mo?e povu?i – za?to bi bio problem uplatiti preko njega ili za?to bi pravila bonusa i dalje va?ila?
Ako je povla?enje odbijeno i sredstva su vra?ena na stanje ra?una, za?to je dobitak konfiskovan?
Dear Thunderbolt Casino team,
Thank you for your explanation. Alright, AML rules are clear. However, allow me to please ask you a few questions.
What exact rules were applied in this case, please? Where can I find them?
Do I understand correctly that there is still an unused deposit of R250 in the player's account?
Were the bonus wagering requirements met? If yes, the maximum cashout/withdrawal rule was already applied upon winnings conversion to the withdrawable balance - why should it be a problem to deposit on top of it, or why should the bonus rules still apply?
If the withdrawal was denied and the funds were returned to the account balance, why have the winnings been confiscated?
Automatski prevedeno: