B?sta Fair Go Casino,
Tack f?r bevisen du har tillhandah?llit.
Jag har granskat spelarens spelhistorik och kan se att totalt 97 satsningar gjordes ?ver det maximala beloppet p? $10.
I ett idealfallsscenario anser vi att kasinon b?r till?mpa sina regler f?r maximal insats p? mjukvaruniv? och d?rf?r inte till?ta spelare att l?gga h?gre insatser ?n till?tna. Detta tar effektivt bort alla spelares klagom?l relaterade till regeln f?r maxinsats, eftersom spelare helt enkelt inte kan bryta mot regeln.
Om det inte ?r m?jligt att uppr?tth?lla maxsatsningar eftersom kasinot k?rs p? programvara fr?n tredje part som inte st?der dem (eller av n?gon annan anledning), b?r kasinot noggrant bed?ma varje fall separat. Vissa spelare kan bryta mot regeln av misstag, t.ex. genom att klicka p? "Max Bet"-knappen p? en spelautomat av misstag. Det ?r or?ttvist att straffa dem f?r detta, speciellt om de inte vann n?got i spelomg?ngarna med ?verdrivna insatsstorlekar.
Av de 97 gjorda insatserna hade endast 8 n?gon positiv effekt p? spelarens balans. Om, som spelaren sa, termen inte var synlig i villkoren f?r den specifika kampanjen, ?r det f?rst?eligt att det kunde ha missats. Vi skulle d?rf?r vilja fr?ga casinot om det kan t?nkas ompr?va sitt beslut i denna fr?ga.
V?nliga H?lsningar,
Adam
Dear Fair Go Casino,
Thank you for the evidence you have provided.
I have reviewed the play history of the player and can see that a total of 97 bets were made above the maximum amount of $10.
In an ideal case scenario, we believe that casinos should enforce their maximum bet rules at the software level and therefore not allow players to place higher than allowed bets. This effectively removes all player complaints related to the max bet rule, as players simply can't break the rule.
If enforcing max bets is not possible because the casino runs on third-party software that doesn't support them (or for any other reason), the casino should carefully judge each case separately. Some players may break the rule by accident, e.g., by clicking the 'Max Bet' button on a slot machine by mistake. It is unfair to punish them for this, especially if they didn't win anything in the game rounds with over-the-top bet sizes.
Of the 97 bets made, only 8 had any positive effect on the balance of the player. If, as the player stated, the term was not visible in the terms of the specific promotion, it is understandable that it could have been missed. We would therefore like to ask the casino if it might reconsider its decision in this matter.
Kind regards,
Adam
Automatiskt ?versatt: