CC'ing deras kollegor?
Tja, de skulle beh?va samla in information om personer som anv?nder deras tj?nster, de g?r den troliga v?gen f?r f?rnekelse h?r men som en FCA-godk?nd leverant?r har de juridiska skyldigheter de m?ste uppfylla, om ett brott har beg?tts med deras tj?nster i' Jag f?rest?ller mig att de enligt lag skulle anses vara medskyldiga om de inte har gjort sin due diligence, eller om de inte kan bevisa att de har rimlig f?rnekelse. eller om de har blivit kontaktade om s?dana fr?gor och v?grat att unders?ka och forts?tta att tillhandah?lla tj?nsterna efter?t.
N?r det g?ller den rimliga f?rnekelsepunkten, om de g?r den v?gen kan det vara ett tveeggat sv?rd eftersom de kan avsl?ja sig sj?lva att utf?ra f?rsumliga metoder som jag ?r s?ker p? skulle vara ett juridiskt brott mot FCA:s regler.
CC'ing their colleagues?
Well they would be required to gather information on people using their services, they're going down the plausible deniability route here but as an FCA approved provider, they have legal obligations they must fulfill, if a crime has been committed using their services i'd imagine they'd be legally found to be complicit if they haven't done their due diligence, or if they can't prove they have plausible deniability. or if they have been contacted about such issues and refused to investigate and continue to provide the services afterward.
On the plausible deniability point, if they go down that route it could be a double edged sword as they might reveal themselves to be undertaking negligent practices which i'm sure would be a legal infraction against FCA regulations.
Automatiskt ?versatt: