Med tanke p? saker och ting och vad jag har l?st ?r denna licenskropp mer strikt. Jag skulle svara kasinot, eftersom de fortfarande m?ste f?lja strikta AML-lagar med korrekta Mcc-koder. Har ocks? ukgl.T?nk p? att du kommer att informera licensmyndigheterna och kopiera deras svarsmail till klagom?let. Med bevis fr?n transaktioner och kontoutdrag som bevisar att betalningar har manipulerats MCC
Vilket bryter mot deras licens
Ocks? falskt f?rv?rv som du gick med genom ett affiliateprogram n?r du inte gjorde det.
Uppenbarligen Ukgc ocks?
By the look of things and what I have read this license body is more strict. I would respond to the casino,as they still must adhere to strict AML laws by correct Mcc codes. Also having ukgl.Make a point that you will inform the licence authorities and copy their response email into the complaint. With proof from transactions and bank statement that prove that payments have been manipulated MCCs
Which breaches their licence
Also false acquisition that you joined through an affiliate program when you did not .
Obviously the ukgc also
Automatiskt ?versatt: