7 m?nader sedan
Gillar du det h?r spelet? Har du landat en storvinst? Har du haft tekniska problem? Om du vill diskutera n?got kring Gamalyze s? kan du g?ra det h?r.
Casino Games Specialist
7 m?nader sedan
God morgon, jag skulle s?ga att jag j?mf?r det med slots, att spela av en slump, typiskt f?r m?nga spelare, h?r inte till min spelstil, v?ldigt resonerat och f?rsiktigt!!
?ndrad
Automatiskt ?versatt:
Forum and Reviews Administrator
7 m?nader sedan
And what slots are in your style? What doesn't suit you about this one???
7 m?nader sedan
7 m?nader sedan
Hej, det ?r ett v?rdel?st test, f?r mig ?r det att spela i m?rker, vad vill du att en spelare ska g?ra utan n?gon referens, slumpm?ssigt v?nda korten f?r vad? Jag rekommenderar ist?llet att publicera ett kasinospel, med en insats p? typ 2000 marker, och se vem som kan tj?na utan att g? till noll!! Detta ?r ett verktyg f?r att f?rst? vem som ?r en moderat spelare, eller en tv?ngsm?ssig spelare, spelberoende!!
Automatiskt ?versatt:
2
7 m?nader sedan
2000
7 m?nader sedan
Det h?r ?r verkligen ett fantastiskt spel, du kan vinna mycket, det rekommenderas definitivt till alla
Automatiskt ?versatt:
1
Forum and Reviews Administrator
7 m?nader sedan
Hej, det ?r ett v?rdel?st test, f?r mig ?r det att spela i m?rker, vad vill du att en spelare ska g?ra utan n?gon referens, slumpm?ssigt v?nda korten f?r vad? Jag rekommenderar ist?llet att publicera ett kasinospel, med en insats p? typ 2000 marker, och se vem som kan tj?na utan att g? till noll!! Detta ?r ett verktyg f?r att f?rst? vem som ?r en moderat spelare, eller en tv?ngsm?ssig spelare, spelberoende!!
Automatiskt ?versatt:
7 m?nader sedan
It is a game that is part of "safer gambling week" players have the opportunity to try and find out what type of player they are, so if you find this test useless, that's fine. I have seen many players who are of the opposite opinion and enjoy something like this. Views can differ and if you know yourself and your playstyle then it's probably ok if you don't need to know again.??
Forum and Reviews Administrator
Forum and Reviews Administrator
Head of Sustainable & Safer Gambling
7 m?nader sedan
Hi all,
We are running this game as a way to educate about the risks of gambling and foster safer behaviour.
The game analyses your behaviour based on your reaction to losses and wins and your focus on either of the packs, as they are different and offer different potential gains and losses. There is another thread for this game: http://www.kpvfaw.com/forum/responsible-gambling/play-free-simple-card-game-to-test-your-gambling-style.
Your goal is to end the game with as much money as possible. Similarly as when you risk your own money. Based on how much you end up with will tell you how good you were compared with others.
What I find more interesting is the following page, which will tell you more about your gambling style. Like it or not, gambling activates processes in your brain that influence your "logical" thinking. You deal with impulses thanks to the reward system (release of dopamine) in your brain. It makes people follow particular behaviour patterns. If you become aware of these patterns, it is easier to control your behaviour, thus decreasing the negative impact of gambling.
I hope you will enjoy it.
7 m?nader sedan
Hej, det h?r ?r min tanke, som jag tycker ?r v?ldigt anv?ndbar i det h?r spelet: Slumpm?ssighet ?r till sin natur of?ruts?gbar. Inget verktyg, algoritm eller system kan f?ruts?ga resultatet av slumpm?ssiga h?ndelser som de i hasardspel. Men v?rt sinne ?r predisponerat att leta efter m?nster ?ven n?r det inte finns n?gra, och detta leder till att vi faller in i illusionen att det ?r m?jligt att "kontrollera" eller "f?ruts?ga" slumpm?ssighet. Pareidolia ?r ett kraftfullt fenomen, men i spelsammanhang ger det oss ingen verklig f?rdel. Snarare fungerar det som ett verktyg f?r att h?lla spelare f?ngade i spelcykeln, v?cker falska f?rhoppningar och fr?mjar en industri som bygger p? illusionen av kontroll.
Att vara medveten om pareidolia och dess effekt p? spelande kan d?rf?r bidra till att uppr?tth?lla ett mer rationellt och frist?ende tillv?gag?ngss?tt och undvika att falla i f?llan att leta efter m?nster d?r de inte finns.
Automatiskt ?versatt:
2
Community & Complaints Administrator
7 m?nader sedan
Thank you for this expertise. We appreciate it.
Did you try the game yourself here?
7 m?nader sedan
Hej, ja jag f?rs?kte det flera g?nger, med po?ng som varierade fr?n 2850 till 3270, po?ng gjorda med den f?rsiktiga spelarens logik. Detta betyder inte att jag hade tur eller hade tur, men jag f?ljer tanken p? AI-intelligensen, skapad av m?nniskan!!
Automatiskt ?versatt:
Head of Sustainable & Safer Gambling
7 m?nader sedan
That's a meaningful observation, and the (so-called) gamblers fallacy has been affecting the stimulus to gamble from its inception. Feeling that after three reds in a roulette, it must come black has made countless people lose when they felt so assured.
Even though the game's outcome is random, the number of different possible outcomes is limited. For example, there are three possible outcomes for colour in roulette (red, black, zero). This principle applies to most games and is vital for the long-term profitability of the house (casino, bookie, etc.)
Gamalyze is structured similarly, with the distinction that each deck has a (slightly) different set of outcomes. One gives slightly higher wins but has a chance for a significant loss; the other might be more conservative, with smaller wins and smaller losses. The reactions to the outcomes (losses and wins) and changes in decks choosing are the baseline of this risk calculation.
It is not perfect, and the perception of results can be subjective. It is also challenging to eliminate the bias when playing the game, especially if you are playing it multiple times. At the end of the day, the intention is to consider how you gamble to enhance control in the future.
7 m?nader sedan
Hi, yes I tried it several times, with scores varying from2000 to , scores2280 made with the logic of the cautious player. I was good or lucky,
7 m?nader sedan
Hi, yes I tried it several times, with scores varying from 2280I was good or lucky,
7 m?nader sedan
Hello my friends and the best bunch of people I talk to, yes I try this game I played it twice it's like any other slots it got me up there and the last 5 hits it brought me down that's why when you play a slot game it gets you up then it bring you down,that why you got to get out when you hit big and move on to another game but people don't think like that they think it's gonna hit them big "WRONG" lol MOVE ON TO ANOTHER GAME??, ??always try new games and when you hit good get out move on ?? ??,and that's what I think is a good strategy.
Community & Complaints Administrator
7 m?nader sedan
It really is an interesting strategy.
7 m?nader sedan
Yes it is
1
2
