DCMS sa f?rst att det inte skulle l?gga till loot boxes till Gambling Act 2005 granskning. De tillk?nnagav dock ?tg?rden f?r f?r?ldrarnas samtycke kort efter, vilket jag anser ?r ett bra s?tt att reglera loot boxes.
Att bevisa att loot boxes ?r faktiska hasardspel kommer sannolikt att vara en tr?kig process (se Nederl?nderna), men att l?na fr?n fungerande l?sningar (dvs. Xbox:s s?tt att kontrollera k?p i spel) ?r vettigt f?r mig.
Vad tycker ni?
http://www.kpvfaw.com/news/gambling-industry/dcms-now-ties-loot-box-purchases-to-parental-consent-1020
DCMS first said it would not add loot boxes to the Gambling Act 2005 review. They announced the parental consent measure shortly after, though, which I feel is a good way to regulate loot boxes.
Proving loot boxes are actual gambling is likely to be a tedious process (see the Netherlands), but borrowing from working solutions (i.e. Xbox's way of controlling in-game purchases) makes sense to me.
What do you guys think?
http://www.kpvfaw.com/news/gambling-industry/dcms-now-ties-loot-box-purchases-to-parental-consent-1020
Automatiskt ?versatt:
