Eftersom r?ttsliga ?tg?rder har varit ett popul?rt ?mne p? forumet ett tag, uppmanar jag alla spelare att delta i diskussionen om detta ?mne.
Till exempel ?r denna synpunkt ganska sp?nnande:
"R?tten f?rklarade ocks? att om spelare var de enda som beg?rde tillbaka f?r sina f?rluster p? den oreglerade marknaden, skulle det ?ka risken f?r missbruk eftersom det felaktigt skulle ingjuta tanken att spelare kan spela utan risk, och h?vdade vidare att n?gon av de tv? parter, det vill s?ga spelare eller operat?r, kan ifr?gas?tta "kontraktet", dvs oreglerat spelande, och beg?ra tillbaka sina pengar.
L?t oss prata om ?sikter.
Since legal action has been a popular topic on the forum for a while, I invite all players to participate in the discussion on this topic.
For example, this viewpoint is quite intriguing:
"The court also explained that if players were the only ones asking back for their losses in the unregulated market, it would increase the risk of addiction as it would falsely instil the idea that gamblers can gamble without risk, and further argued that either of the two parties, that is to say, player or operator, can question the "contract," i.e. unregulated gambling, and seek their money back."
Let's talk about opinions.