Okej, men vi pratar fortfarande om det faktum att du sa att du hade ett hackat konto. Du sa det sj?lv i klagom?let och jag har f?rklarat f?r dig flera g?nger att vi inte kan hj?lpa dig med det.
F?rra g?ngen jag bricker ihop hela resultatet ?t dig: "ber om urs?kt, men ett hackat konto anses vara ett cyberbrott. Vi tycker inte att ditt klagom?l ?r obefogat, vi kan helt enkelt inte hj?lpa dig vidare med ett problem som t.ex. som detta. Du kan alltid kontakta licensmyndigheten eftersom de har fler alternativ och verktyg att unders?ka, men tyv?rr faller detta utanf?r v?r jurisdiktion."
D?rf?r kan du kontakta myndigheterna eftersom ditt ?rendes karakt?r och laglighet inte ?r n?got vi ?r beh?riga att l?sa.
Jag hoppas att du f?rst?r mig och jag skulle inte vilja upprepa mig sj?lv eftersom det b?rjar verka meningsl?st.
Okay, but we're still talking about the fact that you said you had a hacked account. You said it yourself in the complaint and I have explained to you several times that we can't help you with that.
The last time I'm bricking up the whole result for you: "apologize, but a hacked account is considered a cybercrime. We don't think your complaint is unjustified, we simply aren't able to assist you further with a problem such as this. You can always contact the licensing authority as they have more options and tools to investigate, but unfortunately, this falls outside of our jurisdiction."
Therefore, you can contact the authorities because the nature of your case and its legality is not something we are competent to resolve.
I hope you understand me and I would not like to repeat myself because it is beginning to seem pointless.
Automatiskt ?versatt: