Genomspelningsbeloppet och det faktum att bonusen ?r klibbig ?r inte relaterade. Allt beror p? bonusbeloppet som matchas med din ins?ttning, i det h?r fallet 125 USD, som ocks? drogs av i denna situation. Varje g?ng du g?r ett uttag av vinster fr?n en klibbig bonus, kommer beloppet som dras att vara det initiala beloppet som kasinot bidrog med till ditt saldo f?r dig att spela med.
Jag ?r ledsen, men praxis i sig ?r inte n?got som vi anser vara or?ttvist.
V?nligen f?rst? att kasinon alltid kommer att anstr?nga sig f?r att deras bonusar verkar s? attraktiva som m?jligt, nackdelen med att ta bonusar kan vara ett vinsttak, regler om en maximal insats eller liknande begr?nsningar.
P? grund av ovann?mnda sk?l kommer detta klagom?l nu att avvisas. Tack f?r din f?rst?else, jag ?r ledsen att vi inte kunde vara till mer hj?lp vid detta tillf?lle. Tveka inte att kontakta oss om du st?ter p? n?gra problem med detta eller n?got annat casino i framtiden.
The playthrough amount and the fact the bonus is sticky are unrelated. It all depends on the bonus amount that is matched to your deposit, in this case, 125 USD, which was also deducted in this situation. Every time you make a withdrawal of winnings from a sticky bonus, the amount that will be deduced will be the initial amount the casino contributed to your balance for you to play with.
I am sorry but the practice in itself isn't something that we would consider unfair.
Please understand casinos will always make an effort their bonuses appear as attractive as possible, the downside of taking bonuses may be a cap on winnings, rules about a maximum bet, or similar restrictions.
Due to the aforementioned reasons, this complaint will now be rejected. Thank you for your understanding, I am sorry we could not be of more help on this occasion. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you run into any issues with this or any other casino in the future.
Automatiskt ?versatt: