Jag uppskattar ditt snabba svar ang?ende mitt klagom?l. Men jag s?ker fortfarande en tydlig l?sning baserad p? den r?ttsliga ramen f?r hasardspel online i Tyskland, s?rskilt under det nya mellanstatliga f?rdraget om onlinespel (GlüStV 2021) som tr?dde i kraft den 1 juli 2021, och den efterf?ljande implementeringen av OASIS self -uteslutningssystem den 2 augusti 2021.
Enligt klagom?let utesl?t jag mig sj?lv fr?n Vulkanvegas p? grund av ett spelberoende men kunde ?ppna ett nytt konto med samma information och spela spel. Detta verkar vara ett brott mot best?mmelserna om sj?lvuteslutning som syftar till att skydda individer fr?n spelrelaterade skador.
Jag f?rst?r att det juridiska landskapet f?r onlinespel och sj?lvuteslutning har utvecklats med det nya f?rdraget. D?rf?r ?r jag angel?gen om att f?rst? kasinots skyldigheter n?r det g?ller att f?lja f?rfr?gningar om sj?lvuteslutning och best?mmelserna f?r ?terbetalningar till sj?lvuteslutna spelare, enligt den nya lagen och OASIS sj?lvuteslutningssystem.
Dessutom ?r jag medveten om att det har f?rekommit ?terkrav i Tyskland d?r spelare har f?rs?kt ?terkr?va sina insatser fr?n privata operat?rer, vilket noterades i de senaste uppdateringarna av tysk spellag. Den r?ttsliga st?ndpunkten f?r ?terbetalningar f?r sj?lvexkluderade spelare ?r dock fortfarande oklar.
Jag skulle uppskatta om du kunde ge ytterligare klarhet om kasinots skyldigheter och den r?ttsliga m?jlighet som finns tillg?nglig f?r mig som en sj?lvutesluten spelare, s?rskilt i ljuset av de senaste regel?ndringarna. Din v?gledning kommer att vara ov?rderlig f?r att hj?lpa mig att f?rst? n?sta steg i att driva mitt ?terbetalningsanspr?k.
Tack f?r din fortsatta hj?lp.
I appreciate your prompt response regarding my complaint. However, I am still seeking a clear resolution based on the legal framework governing online gambling in Germany, particularly under the new Interstate Treaty on Online Gambling (GlüStV 2021) which took effect on July 1, 2021, and the subsequent implementation of the OASIS self-exclusion system on August 2, 2021.
As per the complaint, I self-excluded from Vulkanvegas due to a gambling addiction but was able to open a new account with the same information and play games. This appears to be a violation of the self-exclusion provisions aimed at protecting individuals from gambling-related harms.
I understand that the legal landscape regarding online gambling and self-exclusion has evolved with the new treaty. Therefore, I am keen on understanding the obligations of the casino in complying with self-exclusion requests and the provisions for refunds to self-excluded players, as stipulated under the new law and the OASIS self-exclusion system.
Furthermore, I am aware that there have been recovery claims in Germany where players have sought to reclaim their stakes from private operators, as noted in the recent updates on German Gaming Law. However, the legal stance on refunds for self-excluded players remains unclear.
I would appreciate it if you could provide further clarity on the casino's obligations and the legal recourse available to me as a self-excluded player, especially in light of the recent regulatory changes. Your guidance will be invaluable in helping me understand the next steps in pursuing my refund claim.
Thank you for your continued assistance.
Automatiskt ?versatt: