Jag beg?rde f?rst ett mindre uttag (0,002 BTC) men det avvisades eftersom casinot beg?rde KYC-verifiering, vilket slutf?rdes framg?ngsrikt, inklusive live-check. Och efter det fortsatte de att avvisa alla mina uttagsf?rfr?gningar.
H?r ?r sk?rmdumpar fr?n sidan med transaktionshistorik:


F?r n?rvarande har uttaget v?ntat i ?ver 3 dagar och chattsupporten svarar inte p? mina meddelanden.
Jag har ocks? skrivit om det h?r problemet p? ett annat forum, och jag bifogar mina inl?gg h?r, eftersom jag tror att du kan hitta mer information i dessa.
Alla inl?gg skrevs den 18 juni.
1:a inl?gget:
Tankar om deras senaste meddelande:
"Potentiell koppling till en bedr?geriorganisation" ?r ett extremt allvarligt p?st?ende – men de tillhandah?ller inga bevis, inga detaljer och ingen formell anm?lan om utredning.
De skjuter ?ver b?rdan p? mig att tillhandah?lla fler dokument (som jag redan f?rklarat ?r tekniskt om?jliga att generera).
Den h?r typen av spr?k anv?nds ofta f?r att r?ttf?rdiga obest?mda uttagsf?rseningar eller konfiskeringar, s?rskilt av skumma akt?rer.
Om de faktiskt utredde mig f?r bedr?geri/penningtv?tt skulle de st?nga av mitt konto och formellt meddela mig – inte spela spel via supportchattar.
2:a inl?gget:
Men hur kan jag samarbeta om de forts?tter att beg?ra det om?jliga?
Hur tar jag en sk?rmdump av en pl?nbokstransaktion med en synlig kontoinnehavare i en pl?nbok som inte ?r f?rvaringsbaserad?... retorisk fr?ga. Och hur kommer det sig att om jag inte beg?rde ett uttag skulle de vara okej med den potentiellt "smutsiga" ins?ttningen, men n?r jag beg?rde ett uttag s?g de pl?tsligt denna potentiellt "smutsiga" ins?ttning som ett problem?
F?rutom det faktum att den n?mnda "smutsiga panten" bara existerar i deras fantasi.
Och hur kan de ens anklaga mig f?r n?gonting utan att l?gga fram n?gra bevis alls? Detta ?r ?terigen bara f?r att f?rsena tillbakadragandet. Forts?tt att hitta p? nya urs?kter.
De stoppade mitt uttag i tv? dagar, vilket fortfarande gick att avbryta av uppenbara sk?l. Sedan pl?tsligt, efter att jag st?llt in den dagliga f?rlustgr?nsen p? 1mBTC, avvisade de det... det ?r verkligen l?gt f?r att ett casino ska kunna spela s?dana spel.
S? girig du m?ste vara f?r att tj?na miljoner men forts?tta spela spel n?r det g?ller uttag.....
Jag har v?ntat p? deras svar i tv? timmar nu och jag vet fortfarande inte vad de beh?ver. "Vi ber er v?nligen att f?rse oss med den information ni kan dela med er av"... vad betyder det ens?
Sanningen ?r att de forts?tter att till?mpa godtyckliga krav i efterhand utan r?ttslig grund eller teknisk motivering.
Det st?r bokstavligen ingenstans i deras policy att de kan kr?va sk?rmdumpar av pl?nb?cker med kontoinnehavarens information – s?rskilt inte f?r pl?nb?cker som inte ?r f?rvaringsplatser..... S? vad f?rv?ntar de sig exakt att jag ska g?ra h?r?
3:e inl?gget:
Det har g?tt ?ver 10 timmar utan svar – men p? n?got s?tt hittade de tid att flytta alla Bitcoin fr?n min ins?ttningsadress till en annan pl?nbok.
Kan n?gon f?rklara logiken h?r?
Om pengarna, enligt dem, "potentiellt var kopplade till en bedr?geriliga inblandad i penningtv?tt", varf?r flyttades de ?verhuvudtaget? Borde inte dessa mynt ha frysts eller satts i karant?n f?r utredning? ?r inte det standardf?rfarande?
Som det ser ut nu ber de mig fortfarande om sk?rmdumpar av transaktioner kopplade till kryptovalutor som redan ?r borta. Min ins?ttningsadress ?r helt tom. S? vad exakt unders?ker de – och vilka fonder syftar de ens p??
Det blir allt tydligare att detta bara ?r ytterligare en f?rhalningstaktik f?r att f?rsena eller neka mitt uttag. Och l?t oss vara ?rliga – ?ven om jag hade lagt fram sk?rmdumparna skulle de f?rmodligen bara komma p? ytterligare en urs?kt f?r att blockera utbetalningen.
Det ?r den fr?msta anledningen till att jag inte har skickat dem – f?rutom att deras egen policy inte n?mner n?got om att kr?va den h?r typen av dokumentation. Dessutom har jag sagt till dem minst tio g?nger att jag anv?nde en icke-f?rvaringsbaserad pl?nbok, s? jag kan helt enkelt inte tillhandah?lla det de ber om.
Och ?ven om jag kunde, eftersom det ?r en icke-f?rvaringsbaserad pl?nbok och ingen kontoinnehavarinformation finns, skulle de sk?rmdumpar de beg?r inte visa dem n?got de inte redan kunde verifiera direkt p? blockkedjan. Vilket bara ytterligare bevisar att de bara dr?jer vid det h?r laget.
I requested smaller withdrawal first (0.002BTC) but it was rejected as the casino requested KYC verification, which was completed successfully, including liveness check. And after that, they were keep rejecting all my withdrawal requests.
Here are the screenshots of the transaction history page:


As for now the withdrawal is pending for over 3 days and chat support do not reply my messages.
I also posted about this issue on another forum, and I will attach my posts on here, as I believe you might find more details in these
All posts were written on JUNE 18th.
1st post:
Thoughts about their last message:
"Potential connection to a fraud ring" is an extremely serious claim — but they provide no evidence, no details, and no formal notification of investigation.
They're shifting the burden onto me to provide more documents (which I already explained are technically impossible to generate).
This kind of language is often used to justify indefinite withdrawal delays or confiscations, especially by shady operators.
If they were actually investigating me for fraud/money laundering, they'd suspend my account and formally notify me — not play games through support chats.
2nd post:
But how can I cooperate if they keep requesting the impossible?
How do I screenshot wallet transaction with visible account holder in a non-custodial wallet?... rhetorical question. And how come if I didn't request withdrawal they would be ok with the potentially 'dirty' deposit, but when I requested withdrawal they suddenly seeing this potentially 'dirty' deposit as a problem?
Besides the fact that mentioned 'dirty deposit' exists only in their imagination.
And how can they even accuse me of anything without providing any evidence whatsoever. This, again, is just to delay the withdrawal. Keep making new excuses.
They were stalling my withdrawal for 2 days, which was still cancelable, for obvious reason. Then suddenly, after I set the daily loss limit to 1mBTC, they rejected it..... this is really low for any casino to play such games.
How greedy you must be to make millions but keep playing games when it comes to withdrawals.....
I'm waiting for their reply for 2 hours now and I still don't know what they need. ''we kindly request that your provide us with the information you are able to share''.... what does that even mean?
The truth is that they keep applying arbitrary requirements after the fact with no legal basis or technical justification.
Literally nowhere in their policy does it say they can demand wallet screenshots with account holder info — especially for non-custodial wallets..... So what exactly do they expect me to do here?
3rd post:
It's been over 10 hours with no reply—yet somehow, they did find the time to move all the Bitcoin from my deposit address to another wallet.
Can someone explain the logic here?
If, according to them, the funds were "potentially connected to a fraud ring involved in money laundering," why were they moved at all? Shouldn't those coins have been frozen or quarantined for investigation? Isn't that standard procedure?
As it stands, they’re still asking me for screenshots of transactions tied to coins that are already gone. My deposit address is completely empty. So what exactly are they investigating—and what funds are they even referring to?
It’s becoming increasingly clear that this is just another stalling tactic to delay or deny my withdrawal. And let’s be honest—even if I provided the screenshots, they'd likely just come up with yet another excuse to block the payout.
That’s the main reason I haven’t sent them—aside from the fact that their own policy makes no mention of requiring this kind of documentation. On top of that, I’ve told them at least ten times that I used a non-custodial wallet, so I simply cannot provide what they’re asking for.
And even if I could, since it's a non-custodial wallet and no account holder information exists, any screenshots they’re requesting wouldn’t show them anything they couldn’t already verify directly on the blockchain. Which only further proves that they're just stalling at this point.
Redigerad
Automatiskt ?versatt: