Rakas Adam.
Se on v??rin. Siksi valitus m??r?ttiin palauttamaan uudelleen.
K?ytin kyseist? bonusta vasta 24. joulukuuta j?lkeen.
Maksut siihen asti johtuvat pelin pelaamisesta normaalilla heijastusnopeudella.
Todisteena on, ett? en ole saanut kasinolta t?llaista ilmoitusta mist??n nostoistani 18. joulukuuta menness?.
Kasino on tarkastanut ja hyv?ksynyt kaikki siihen menness? tehdyt kotiutukset, eik? t?ss? pit?isi olla ongelmia.
Siksi on s??nt?jen vastaista tuoda esiin aiempia nostoja nyt ja v?itt??, ett? ne ovat enemm?n kuin talletussumma. Eik? olekin?
Siit? hetkest?, kun rekister?idyin kasinolle 18. joulukuuta asti.
→Olin pelannut pelej? ilman ongelmia, ja kasino oli todennut, ettei nostoissa ollut ongelmia.
joulukuuta 24
→Tein uuden 2500 dollarin talletuksen ja hy?dynsin bonuksen.
Vaikuttaa kuitenkin silt?, ett? kasino teki virheen asettaessaan uusien pelien prosenttiosuutta, ja tilini j??dytettiin sen vuoksi.
T?ll? hetkell?
→Kasino v?itt??, ett? $2500 palautus on jostain syyst? suoritettu ennen 18. joulukuuta tehdyist? nostoista.
Osoittautuu, ett? t?ss? tapauksessa kyseess? on vain se, ett? 24. joulukuuta talletusbonuksessa oli ongelma ja ett? kaikki aiemmat maksut olivat merkityksett?mi?.
Siksi kasinon on palautettava vain 2 500 dollaria t?st? 2 500 dollarin talletuksesta.
Jos kasino olisi j??dytt?nyt tilini 18. joulukuuta ongelmien vuoksi, en olisi tehnyt viimeist? talletustani.
Jos ongelma oli ollut aiemmin, miksi kasino vaikeni? Minusta n?ytt??, ett? he huijasivat minut tekem??n talletuksen.
Lis?ksi kierr?tysvaatimus oli aina 100 % kasinon j?rjestelm?ss?, eik? ehdoissa ollut mainintaa 10 %:sta.
Vaikuttaa silt?, ett? kasino oli virheellisesti asettanut noin 24.12. lis?tyn pelin koron 100 %:iin, kun sen sis?isesti olisi pit?nyt olla 10 %, ja tietenk??n k?ytt?j?n on mahdotonta ymm?rt??, ett? t?m? on virhe.
Dear Adam.
That is incorrect. Therefore, an order was issued to remand the complaint.
I did not use the bonus in question until after December 24.
Payments up to that point are due to game play at the normal reflective rate.
The evidence is that I have not received any such communication from the casino on any of my withdrawals up to December 18.
All withdrawals up to that point have been reviewed and approved by the casino, and there should be no problems here.
Therefore, it is against the rules to bring up past withdrawals now and claim that they are more than the deposit amount. Is it not?
From the time I register at the casino until December 18.
→I had been playing games without any problems, and the casino had determined that there were no problems with withdrawals.
December 24th
→I made a new deposit of $2500 and took advantage of the bonus.
However, it seems that the casino made a mistake in setting the percentage of newly played games, and my account was frozen because of it.
Currently
→The casino is claiming that the refund of $2500 has been completed for withdrawals made before December 18, for some reason.
It turns out that the issue at stake in this case is only that there was a problem with the December 24 deposit bonus, and that all previous payments were irrelevant.
Therefore, the casino is only required to refund $2,500 for this deposit of $2,500.
If the casino had frozen my account as of December 18 due to problems, I would not have made my last deposit in the first place.
If there had been a problem before, why did the casino keep quiet? It seems to me that they tricked me into making a deposit.
In addition, the wagering requirement was always 100% in the casino's system, and there was no indication of 10% in the terms and conditions.
It seems that the casino had mistakenly set the rate About the game added on or about December 24, to 100% when it should have been 10% internally, and of course it is impossible for the user to realize that this is an error.
Muokattu
Automaattinen k??nn?s: