Dragi Adame.
To je neta?no. Zbog toga je doneta naredba o vra?anju pritu?be.
Doti?ni bonus sam iskoristio tek nakon 24. decembra.
Uplate do tog trenutka su zbog igranja igre po normalnoj stopi refleksije.
Dokaz je da nisam primio nikakvu takvu informaciju od kazina ni o jednom od mojih povla?enja do 18. decembra.
Sve isplate do tog trenutka su pregledane i odobrene od strane kazina, i ovde ne bi trebalo da bude problema.
Zbog toga je protiv pravila da se sada iznose ranija povla?enja i tvrde da su oni ve?i od iznosa depozita. Zar ne?
Od trenutka kada se registrujem u kazinu do 18. decembra.
→Igrao sam igre bez ikakvih problema, a kazino je utvrdio da nema problema sa isplatama.
24. decembra
→Uplatio sam novi depozit od $2500 i iskoristio bonus.
Me?utim, ?ini se da je kazino pogre?io u pode?avanju procenta novoigranih igara i moj nalog je zbog toga zamrznut.
Trenutno
→Kazino tvrdi da je povra?aj od 2500 dolara iz nekog razloga zavr?en za isplate izvr?ene pre 18. decembra.
Ispostavilo se da je u ovom slu?aju u pitanju samo to ?to je postojao problem sa bonusom na depozit od 24. decembra i da su sve prethodne uplate bile irelevantne.
Prema tome, od kazina se tra?i da vrati samo 2.500 dolara za ovaj depozit od 2.500 dolara.
Da mi je kazino zamrznuo ra?un od 18. decembra zbog problema, uop?te ne bih napravio svoj poslednji depozit.
Ako je i ranije bilo problema, za?to je kazino ?utao? ?ini mi se da su me prevarili da napravim depozit.
Pored toga, uslov za kla?enje je uvek bio 100% u sistemu kazina, i nije bilo naznaka 10% u uslovima i odredbama.
?ini se da je kazino gre?kom postavio stopu O igri dodatoj 24. decembra ili pribli?no na 100% kada je interno trebalo da bude 10%, i naravno da je nemogu?e da korisnik shvati da je to gre?ka.
Dear Adam.
That is incorrect. Therefore, an order was issued to remand the complaint.
I did not use the bonus in question until after December 24.
Payments up to that point are due to game play at the normal reflective rate.
The evidence is that I have not received any such communication from the casino on any of my withdrawals up to December 18.
All withdrawals up to that point have been reviewed and approved by the casino, and there should be no problems here.
Therefore, it is against the rules to bring up past withdrawals now and claim that they are more than the deposit amount. Is it not?
From the time I register at the casino until December 18.
→I had been playing games without any problems, and the casino had determined that there were no problems with withdrawals.
December 24th
→I made a new deposit of $2500 and took advantage of the bonus.
However, it seems that the casino made a mistake in setting the percentage of newly played games, and my account was frozen because of it.
Currently
→The casino is claiming that the refund of $2500 has been completed for withdrawals made before December 18, for some reason.
It turns out that the issue at stake in this case is only that there was a problem with the December 24 deposit bonus, and that all previous payments were irrelevant.
Therefore, the casino is only required to refund $2,500 for this deposit of $2,500.
If the casino had frozen my account as of December 18 due to problems, I would not have made my last deposit in the first place.
If there had been a problem before, why did the casino keep quiet? It seems to me that they tricked me into making a deposit.
In addition, the wagering requirement was always 100% in the casino's system, and there was no indication of 10% in the terms and conditions.
It seems that the casino had mistakenly set the rate About the game added on or about December 24, to 100% when it should have been 10% internally, and of course it is impossible for the user to realize that this is an error.
Izmenjeno
Automatski prevedeno: