The player from India had an issue with 22bet Casino. He reported that his account had been blocked after the casino had inquired about his relationship with an unidentified name, which he couldn't identify. The player confirmed that he had passed all KYC requirements and had a balance of over 13,000 RS in his account. He often used his company's LAN wifi, which might have caused an IP conflict. The casino had accused the player of violating the rules by creating multiple accounts but failed to provide evidence to support their claim. We closed the case as 'unresolved' due to the lack of evidence from the casino and advised the player to contact the gaming authority that regulated the casino.
Igra? iz Indije je imao problem sa 22bet kazinom. On je prijavio da mu je ra?un blokiran nakon ?to se kazino raspitao o njegovoj vezi sa neidentifikovanim imenom, koje nije mogao da identifikuje. Igra? je potvrdio da je pro?ao sve KIC uslove i da je na ra?unu imao stanje od preko 13.000 RS. ?esto je koristio LAN vifi svoje kompanije, ?to je moglo izazvati IP konflikt. Kazino je optu?io igra?a da je prekr?io pravila kreiranjem vi?e naloga, ali nije pru?io dokaze koji bi podr?ali svoju tvrdnju. Slu?aj smo zatvorili kao ?nere?en“ zbog nedostatka dokaza iz kazina i savetovali smo igra?a da kontaktira autoritet za igre na sre?u koji je regulisao kazino.
Automatski prevedeno:
