Hvala vam na dostavljenim detaljima, mogu potvrditi da imam e-po?tu i da sam je postavio me?u dokaze za ovaj slu?aj, na na? sistem. Na?alost, ne?emo mo?i da izvr?imo povra?aj celog novca koji ste deponovali, a u nastavku ?u poku?ati da objasnim razlog za ovo. Me?utim, va? nalog nije zatvoren u razumnom roku, tako da je delimi?no povra?aj sredstava. Evo dogovora:
Iako je ta?no da ste zatra?ili zatvaranje naloga od februara, niste naveli razlog za zavisnost od kockanja . Obi?no, kada tra?ite zatvaranje naloga i navedete razlog ?to jednostavno vi?e ne ?elite da igrate u kazinu (ili uop?te ne navodite razlog), imate opciju da jednostavno prestanete da igrate. To je isto kao da ste imali lo?e iskustvo u restoranu i prestali da idete tamo na svoje obroke. Tako?e, uobi?ajena je praksa me?u igra?ima nakon ?to pretrpe ve?i gubitak, da ka?u u ?aru trenutka da ?ele da kazino zatvori njihov ra?un. Nekoliko dana kasnije tra?e da se ponovo otvori i igraju kao i obi?no. Neki igra?i ?ak koriste ovo kao priliku da dobiju neku vrstu povrata novca ili bonus igre od kazina. U svim ovim slu?ajevima pretpostavlja se da je igra? potpuno sposoban da sam donosi odluke i da igra samo zato ?to ?eli i mo?e da prestane u bilo kom trenutku. Ni?ta ih ne primorava da tro?e vi?e novca u kazinu, tako da sve ?to je deponovano izme?u zahteva za zatvaranje ra?una i stvarnog zatvaranja, nije izvr?no.
Sada ako igra? zatra?i zatvaranje naloga i jasno ka?e da ima problem sa kockanjem - ovo je sasvim druga pri?a. Zavisnici od kockanja ne kontroli?u sopstveno kompulzivno pona?anje i mogu lako da potro?e sav svoj novac u kazinu i da upropastite svoje ?ivote. Zato je o takvim slu?ajevima potrebno voditi ra?una sa najve?om va?nosti i pa?njom. U takvim slu?ajevima ra?un treba zatvoriti ?to pre (ili barem onemogu?iti opcije za deponovanje i igranje igrica) kako bi igra? bio siguran. Ako kazino ignori?e takav hitan zahtev i dozvoli igra?u da nastavi sa deponovanjem i gubitkom novca jo? du?e - pre kona?nog zatvaranja ra?una - u takvim slu?ajevima verujemo da igra? ima pravo da im se depoziti vrate (minus svi dobici povu?eni u me?uvremenu) ako su se ti depoziti desili izme?u zahteva za samoisklju?ivanje i stvarnog zatvaranja ra?una.
Po?to ste zahtevali odgovaraju?e samoisklju?ivanje tek po?etkom aprila, ne mo?emo da zahtevamo povra?aj novca za bilo ?ta unapred deponovano. Sada ?emo sa?ekati da kazino kona?no zatvori nalog bez opcije za ponovno otvaranje, a zatim ?emo poku?ati da posredujemo u povra?aju sredstava.
Thank you for the provided details, I can confirm I have the e-mail and uploaded it amongst the evidence for this case, onto our system. Unfortunately, we will not be able to enforce the refund of all the money you have deposited, and I will try to explain the reason behind this below. However, your account has not been closed within the reasonable time, so partial refund is in place. Here is the deal:
While it is true you have requested an account closure since February, you have not stated a reason being gambling addiction. Normally, when asking for an account closure and stating the reason being you just don't want to play in the casino anymore (or not stating a reason at all), you have an option of simply stop playing. It's the same as if you had a bad experience in a restaurant and stopped going there for your meals. Also, it is a common practice amongst players after incurring a heftier loss, to say in the heat of the moment they want the casino to close their account. Few days later they ask for it to be re-opened and they play as usual. Some players even use this as an opportunity to get some kind of a cashback or a bonus play from the casino. In all of these cases, it is assumed that the player is fully capable of making decisions for themselves, and they play only because they want to and can stop at any time. Nothing forces them to spend more money in the casino, so anything that is deposited between the request of account closure and the actual closure, is not enforceable.
Now if the player asks for an account closure and clearly states they have a gambling problem - this is completely different story. Gambling addicts are not in control of their own compulsive behaviour, and can easily spend all their money in the casino and ruin their lives. That is why such cases needs to be taken care of with utmost importance and care. In such cases account should be closed ASAP (or at least the options for depositing and playing games should be disabled) so the player is safe. If the casino ignores such urgent request and allows the player to keep depositing and losing money even longer - before finally closing the account - in such cases we believe the player is entitled for their deposits to be returned (minus any winnings withdrawn in the meantime) if those deposits happened between the self-exclusion request and an actual account closure.
As you have requested proper self-exclusion only at around the beginning of the April, we can't request refunds of anything deposited beforehand. We will now wait for the casino to finally close the account without the option for re-opening, then we'll try to mediate the refund.
Automatski prevedeno: