Imejl je star vi?e od godinu dana, a imejl sa potvrdom je nestao.
Kao dokaz, imamo imejl od Vega Wallet-a, na?eg elektronskog nov?anika, koji dokazuje da je depozit izvr?en sa Casino Days-a.
Da li postoji ikakvo opravdanje da kazino ne prihvati dokaz od VegaWallet-a, ?iji je Conquistador tako?e partner?
Tako?e, gledaju?i ?albe drugih ljudi, ?ini se da isplate nisu mogu?e ?ak ni u situacijama kada je izvor verifikovala neka grupa. U toj situaciji, ?ini se da dokaz o poreklu koji kazino tvrdi ne spada u op?ti standard i mogu?e je da kazino posluje sa zlonamernom namerom, koriste?i verifikaciju identiteta kao razlog za odbijanje isplata.
Molim vas da donesete pravedan sud na osnovu svih okolnosti.
The email is over a year old and the confirmation email has disappeared.
As evidence, we have an email from Vega Wallet, our e-wallet, which proves that the deposit was made from Casino Days.
Is there any justification for the casino not to accept the proof from VegaWallet, of which Conquistador is also an affiliate?
Also, looking at the complaints of other people, it seems that withdrawals are not possible even in situations where the source has been verified by a group. In that situation, it seems that the proof of origin claimed by the casino does not fall within the general standard, and it is possible that the casino is operating with a malicious intent, using identity verification as a reason for refusing withdrawals.
Please make a fair judgment based on all the circumstances.
メールは1年以上前のもので確認(rèn)メールは消えております。
証拠としましてはイーウォレットにあたるベガウォレットからカジノデイズからの入金だと証明されているメールがございます。
コンクエスタドールも加盟店でもあるベガウォレットからの証明を認(rèn)めないカジノ側(cè)に正當(dāng)性ございますか?
また他人様のクレームを見(jiàn)ておりますと、グルで出処を証明されている狀況におかれましても出金できていないみたいですが、その狀況でカジノ側(cè)の主張にある出所の証明が一般基準(zhǔn)の範(fàn)囲とは到底思えず、本人確認(rèn)を出金拒否の理由にしている悪質(zhì)性の高い運(yùn)営である可能性がございます。
全ての狀況から公正な判斷をお願(yuàn)いします。
Automatski prevedeno: