Zdravo!
Kao ?to sam objavio u drugoj temi, situacija postaje zaista o?ajna.
Pro?le srede tokom razgovora usredsre?enog na komplikovana pitanja igra?a moje kolege su spomenule rastu?i trend tako masovnih grupnih promocija i nemogu?nosti kazina da obezbede isklju?ivanje zavisnih igra?a iz kampanja putem e-po?te nakon ?to su njihovi nalozi zatvoreni zbog zavisnosti.
Slo?ili smo se da je takva situacija problemati?na i da je treba izbegavati. Me?utim, uvek postoji neka kvaka. Verujemo da mo?emo da poku?amo da pomognemo samo ako se takvi mejlovi ?alju sa zvani?ne kazino e-po?te, a ne preko pridru?enih partnera ili promo partnera. Tre?e strane, kako god to zvu?alo, su van na?eg doma?aja.
Mogu da zamislim da bi se isto moglo desiti sa mnogo vi?e prethodno zatvorenih naloga; nije bitno da li su zavisnosti bile uklju?ene ili ne. Tako?e, ve? sam ?uo da takvi ra?uni u mnogim slu?ajevima nisu tehni?ki potpuno zatvoreni. Ba? kao ?to ste rekli, "u pregledu" ili ne?to sli?no.
Kada su u pitanju mailing liste, mo?da bi pitanje lokalne vlasti koja nadgleda uskla?enost sa GDPR-om moglo dovesti do ne?ega.
U svakom slu?aju, slobodno podnesite ?albu na to. Po mom mi?ljenju, trajno zatvaranje ra?una je razuman zahtev i kazino bi trebalo da se – u razumnim granicama – pona?a u skladu sa tim.
Hello!
As I posted in the other thread, the situation is getting really desperate.
It was just last Wednesday during a call focused on complicated player issues when my colleagues mentioned the increasing trend of such massive group promotions and casinos inability to ensure excluding addicted players from email campaigns once their accounts have been closed due to addiction.
We agreed such a situation is troublesome and should be avoided. However, there is always some catch. We believe we can try to help only if such emails are sent from the official casino email, not through affiliate partners or promo partners. Third parties, despite how it may sound, are beyond our reach.
I can imagine the same may be happening with many more previously closed accounts; it does not matter whether the addictions were involved or not. Also, I have already heard that such accounts have not been, in many cases, technically fully closed. Just as you said, "under review" or something similar.
When it comes to the mailing lists, perhaps asking the local authority overseeing GDPR compliance may lead to something.
In any case, feel free to submit a complaint about that. In my opinion, permanent account closure is a reasonable request and the casino should be - within reasonable borders - acting accordingly.
Automatski prevedeno: