Vi?e ne pi?em kao frustrirani kupac, ve? kao neko ko sada ima potpun uvid u to kako va?i sistemi aktivno olak?avaju i imaju koristi od neregulisanih operacija kockanja. Potpuno ste svesni da su transakcije preko DPA*-?vorova (kao ?to su DPApdgshk, DPAvacmah) pogre?no klasifikovane kao ?IT usluge" ili ?blok?ejn re?enja" – dok sredstva zavr?avaju u kockarnicama koje sami bankirate. Ovo nije slu?ajnost, ve? strukturni deo va?eg poslovnog modela.
Vi ta?no znate ?ta se de?ava:
? Va?i interni dnevniki sadr?e oznake kao ?to su is_casino:true i RVG-FRAUD za ove transakcije, ali vi birate da ih filtrirate iz izve?taja klijenata.
? Svaka fragmentirana transakcija ispod 45 EUR (preko Coinshop.vork ili Munzen Ecom) je dizajnirana da zaobi?e va? sopstveni AML sistem – ne?to ?to zahteva tehni?ko planiranje sa va?e strane.
? Dobijate dvostruko: naknade od mene i od kazina koji koriste Revolut Business naloge za prikupljanje novca igra?a.
Va? "kockarski blok" je ?ala:
Kako mo?ete tvrditi da vam je stalo do zavisnosti od kockanja kada ste sami najve?i deo problema? Svaki put kada uplatim sredstva preko DPA*-gatevai-a, ona zavr?e u kazinima kojima pru?ate bankarske usluge. Vi niste pasivno oru?e – vi ste sau?esnici. Ponuditi ?blok" je kao da prodajete i otrov i protivotrov, ali namerno ?inite protivotrov neefikasnim.
Ovo je vi?e nego neeti?no – to je eksploatacija:
Iskori??avate zavisnost ljudi da biste maksimizirali svoj profit. Dok sebe ogla?avate kao ?odgovornu banku", istovremeno ?aljete milione svakog meseca u sumnjive kazina preko estonskih i malte?kih kompanija. Zatim, kada odbijete povra?aj sredstava (navode?i ?neta?nu klasifikaciju"), to samo pokazuje koliko je duboko korupcija.
Evo realnosti koju vi?e ne mo?ete ignorisati:
1. Imam blockchain dokaz koji povezuje moje Revolut depozite sa nov?anicima u vlasni?tvu kazina.
2. Va?e sopstvene API integracije sa Varrock Group i Tsinda Limited su dokumentovane u javnim evidencijama.
3. Zahtev za GDPR koji sam poslao otkriva da vi interno klasifikujete ove transakcije kao ?visoko rizi?ne – kazino", ali ih ipak pu?tate da pro?u.
Kako izbe?i dalju eskalaciju:
– Odmah povra?aj svih mojih povra?aja sredstava koje ste odbili.
Ako ne reagujete u roku od 48 sati, ja ?u:
? Objavite svu dokumentaciju (uklju?uju?i va?e interne reference koda) na dru?tvenim medijima i sajtovima sa vestima.
? Prijavite vas Upravi za finansijski nadzor za kr?enje zakona o spre?avanju pranja novca i propisa o za?titi potro?a?a.
Vi?e se ne mo?ete sakriti iza ?tehni?kih ograni?enja" ili ?odgovornosti tre?ih strana". Znam – i uskoro ?e svi znati – da je Revolut glavni pokreta? ovog sistema. Va?i klijenti zaslu?uju bolje nego da ih banka iskori??ava na njihovoj ranjivosti za profit.
Dennis Nilsson
I am no longer writing as a frustrated customer, but as someone who now has full insight into how your systems actively facilitate and benefit from unregulated gambling operations. You are fully aware that transactions via DPA*-nodes (such as DPApdgshk, DPAwacmah) are misclassified as "IT services" or "blockchain solutions" – while the funds end up with casinos that you yourselves bank. This is no coincidence, but a structural part of your business model.
You know exactly what is happening:
? Your internal logs contain flags like is_casino:true and RVG-FRAUD for these transactions, but you choose to filter them out of customer reports.
? Every fragmented transaction under 45 EUR (via Coinshop.work or Munzen Ecom) is designed to bypass your own AML system – something that requires technical planning on your part.
? You profit twice: fees from me and from casinos using Revolut Business accounts to collect players’ money.
Your "gambling block" is a joke:
How can you claim to care about gambling addiction when you yourselves are the biggest part of the problem? Every time I deposit funds via DPA*-gateways, they end up at casinos you provide banking services to. You are not a passive tool – you are complicit. Offering a "block" is like selling both the poison and the antidote, but deliberately making the antidote ineffective.
This is more than unethical – it is exploitation:
You exploit people’s addiction to maximize your profits. While you market yourselves as a "responsible bank", you simultaneously send millions every month to shady casinos through Estonian and Maltese shell companies. Then, when you refuse chargebacks (citing "incorrect classification"), it just shows how deep the corruption runs.
Here is the reality you can no longer ignore:
1. I have blockchain proof connecting my Revolut deposits to wallets owned by casinos.
2. Your own API integrations with Varrock Group and Tsinda Limited are documented in public records.
3. The GDPR request I sent revealed that you internally classify these transactions as "High-risk - Casino", yet still let them pass.
How to avoid escalation further:
- Immediate refund of all my chargebacks that you declined.
If you do not act within 48 hours, I will:
? Publish all documentation (including your internal code references) to social media and news sites.
? Report you to the Financial Supervisory Authority for violations of anti-money laundering legislation and consumer protection regulations.
You can no longer hide behind "technical limitations" or "third-party responsibilities". I know – and soon everyone will know – that Revolut is the primary driver behind this system. Your customers deserve better than to be exploited by a bank that capitalizes on their vulnerabilities for profit.
Dennis Nilsson
Automatski prevedeno: