Dragi kazino ?Prava sre?a",
Razumem da je zavr?etak procesa KYC (Upoznaj svog klijenta) su?tinski uslov za odr?avanje uskla?enosti sa propisima. Me?utim, ?eleo bih da se osvrnem na ono ?to smatram nedovoljnim za?titnim merama u situacijama kada igra? zahteva samoisklju?enje zbog problema sa kockanjem.
Kada se podnese takav zahtev, klju?no je da kazino brzo reaguje. Iako trenutna suspenzija naloga nije uvek izvodljiva, za?titne mere treba sprovesti bez nepotrebnog odlaganja. Prisustvo neverifikovanog naloga ili ?ekaju?eg povla?enja ne bi trebalo da ometa proces samoisklju?ivanja. Osiguravanje da igra? ne mo?e da nastavi sa uplatom sredstava, pristupom ?ekaju?im povla?enjima ili gubitkom aktivnog stanja je od najve?e va?nosti.
Razumno je zavr?iti KYC verifikaciju nakon obustave aktivnosti na nalogu. Me?utim, sam proces samoisklju?enja ne bi trebalo da bude uslovljen zavr?etkom KYC-a. Vo?enje evidencije igra?a koji zahtevaju samoisklju?enje, ali jo? nisu zavr?ili KYC, bio bi pametan korak za budu?e potrebe.
Ukratko, proces samoisklju?enja treba da da prioritet za?titi igra?a. Nakon ?to kazino potvrdi zahtev za samoisklju?enje, treba preduzeti slede?e korake:
- Ograni?ite funkcije naloga: Ograni?ite mogu?nost igra?a da odmah upla?uje i kladi sredstva.
- Zavr?ite KYC nakon ograni?enja: Ispunite KYC zahteve nakon ?to se uverite da je igra?eva kockarska aktivnost zaustavljena.
- Re?avanje povra?aja novca nakon KYC procesa: Ako igra? ima pravo na povra?aj novca, ova pitanja se mogu re?iti nakon ?to se KYC proces zavr?i.
Ovakav pristup uravnote?uje potrebe obe strane. Igra? dobija blagovremenu za?titu, a kazino osigurava uskla?enost kroz zavr?etak KYC procedura. Nadam se da ?e ove povratne informacije pomo?i u pobolj?anju va?ih procesa i bolje slu?iti igra?ima kojima je potrebna podr?ka.
Dear True Luck Casino,
I understand that completing the KYC (Know Your Customer) process is an essential requirement for maintaining regulatory compliance. However, I would like to address what I perceive as insufficient protective measures in situations where a player requests self-exclusion due to a gambling problem.
When such a request is made, it is crucial for the casino to act promptly. While immediate suspension of the account may not always be feasible, protective measures should be implemented without undue delay. The presence of an unverified account or a pending withdrawal should not hinder the self-exclusion process. Ensuring that the player cannot continue to deposit funds, access pending withdrawals, or lose their active balance is paramount.
It is reasonable to complete KYC verification after the suspension of account activities. However, the self-exclusion process itself should not be contingent on KYC completion. Maintaining records of players who request self-exclusion but have not yet completed KYC would be a prudent step for future reference.
To summarize, the self-exclusion process should prioritize the protection of the player. After the casino acknowledges a self-exclusion request, the following steps should be taken:
- Restrict Account Functions: Limit the player's ability to deposit and wager funds immediately.
- Complete KYC After Restriction: Address the KYC requirements after ensuring that the player's gambling activity has been halted.
- Resolve Refunds Post-KYC: If the player is entitled to refunds, these matters can be addressed once the KYC process is finalized.
This approach balances the needs of both parties. The player receives timely protection, and the casino ensures compliance through the completion of KYC procedures. I hope this feedback helps improve your processes and better serves players in need of support.
Automatski prevedeno: