K?ra alla,
Vi har diskuterat detta fall med casinorepresentanten. Vi har informerats om att anledningen till att kasinot st?ngde SlavSplavs konto utan ?terbetalning var en uppt?ckt anv?ndning av en kortr?kningsstrategi i Live Baccarat-spel.
Trots detta anser vi dock att spelaren ska f? betalt. Strategin som spelaren anv?nde ?r mycket ineffektiv och l?tt att uppt?cka, d?rf?r kunde de ha uteslutits fr?n spel innan de samlade vinster med hj?lp av strategin och beg?rde ett uttag.
V?rt f?rslag till Dublinbet Casino, i detta fall, skulle vara att l?ta spelaren beh?lla sina vinster och begr?nsa deras tillg?ng till Baccarat-spel eller sitt spelkonto.
Vi har f?rklarat v?r position f?r kasinot, men tyv?rr v?grade de att f?lja den och ?ndrade inte sitt beslut.
P? grund av dessa sk?l tvingas vi avsluta ?rendet som "ol?st".
Kasinot kan n?r som helst ?ppna detta klagom?l igen.
Dear all,
We have discussed this case with the casino representative. We have been advised that the reason why the casino closed SlavSplav’s account without a refund was a detected use of a card counting strategy in Live Baccarat games.
However, despite this fact, we believe that the player should be paid. The strategy the player used is very ineffective and easy to detect, therefore they could have been excluded from play before accumulating winnings using the strategy and requesting a withdrawal.
Our suggestion to Dublinbet Casino, in this case, would be to let the player keep their winnings and restrict their access to Baccarat games or their gaming account.
We have explained our position to the casino, but unfortunately, they refused to comply with it and did not change their decision.
Due to these reasons, we are forced to close this case as ‘unresolved’.
The casino can reopen this complaint anytime.
Automatiskt ?versatt: