Hej,
Tack f?r ditt fortsatta st?d och l?nkarna!
Jag kontaktade Flappy Casino ang?ende den vilseledande betalningsinformationen, men deras svar avvisade mitt krav p? ?terbetalning baserat p? deras villkor. De betonar sitt icke-ansvar i sitt svar:
"V?rt team ?r ledsna att f?rst? din situation och ?nskar dig allt gott i ditt liv, men vi kan inte h?llas ansvariga..."
Den h?r Reuters-artikeln fr?n foruml?nken du angav, belyser denna oroande praxis som Flappy Casino och liknande kasinon ?r OK med — dumma onlinebutiker som anv?nds f?r att d?lja spelbetalningar.
M?jligheten att kringg? s?kerhets?tg?rder som Merchant Category Codes v?cker allvarliga farh?gor om transaktions?vervakning. Och bankanst?lldas insikt l?ngre ner i inl?gget h?r l?gger till ytterligare ett lager, och avsl?jar exakt samma sak som mitt ursprungliga inl?gg, hur betalningar till dessa spelsajter ?r f?rkl?dda som orelaterade k?p, vilket m?jligen bryter mot reglerna. Det ?r bara hemskt och m?ste lyftas fram och stoppas!
Som en oberoende k?lla om onlinekasinon b?r du seri?st ?verv?ga att l?gga till denna information till recensionerna av relaterade casinon.
Tyv?rr fortsatte mina kamper, inte med Flappy Casino, utan med Starscream LTD (Gammix) kasinon, vilket resulterade i en ytterligare f?rlust p? 11 000 DKK under julperioden fram till ig?r... (Alla Starscream LTD kasinon anv?nder ocks? dessa typer av f?rt?ckta k?p f?r att kringg? MCC-checkar, med betalningsleverant?rsinformation som "Wisetore tech", "Mydelivery", "Ratelux" och mer.)
Med tanke p? de f?reslagna stegen, inklusive att kontakta Licensing Authority , ?r din v?gledning f?r att navigera i den h?r situationen ov?rderlig. Tack ?n en g?ng f?r ditt st?d.
Hi,
Thanks for your continued support and the links!
I reached out to Flappy Casino about the misleading payment information, but their response rejected my refund claim based on their terms and conditions. They emphasize their non-liability in their reply:
"Our team is sorry to understand about your situation, and wish you all the best in your life; however, we cannot be held liable..."
This Reuters article from the forum link you provided, highlights this disturbing practice that Flappy Casino and similar casinos are OK with —dummy online stores used to disguise gambling payments.
The ability to bypass safeguards like the Merchant Category Codes raises serious concerns about transaction oversight. And the bank employee's insight futher down in the post here adds another layer, revealing the exact same thing like my original post , how payments to thse gambling sites are disguised as unrelated purchases, possibly violating regulations. It's just horrible and needs to be highlighted and stopped !
As an indepented source about online casinos you should seriously consider adding this information to the reviews of the related casinos.
Unfortunately, my struggles continued, not with Flappy Casino, but with Starscream LTD (Gammix) casinos, resulting in an additional loss of 11,000 DKK during the Christmas period up until yesterday... (All Starscream LTD casinos also uses these types of disguised purchases to bypass MCC checks, with payment provider info such as "Wisetore tech" ,"Mydelivery", "Ratelux" and more.)
Considering the suggested steps, including reaching out to the Licensing Authority , your guidance on navigating this situation is invaluable. Thanks once again for your support.
Redigerad
Automatiskt ?versatt: