Hej och tack f?r f?rklaringen. Jag borde ha b?rjat med att f?rklara att jag kan l?gga till min eller l?t oss s?ga demonstrera CG-optik till det ?mnet. My bad, f?rl?t. ??
Tja, jag antar att alla spelare kan anv?nda hela internet f?r att skapa en ?sikt om ett kasino. Mina kollegor ?verv?ger ist?llet utv?rderade situationer. Baserat p? v?ra erfarenheter av de externa k?llorna valde vi detta s?tt.
Men jag vet att det finns en person som sp?rar externa klagom?l – inte TP-recensioner, eftersom deras policy ?r absurd. S? l?nge de till?ter spelare att recensera Casino Guru f?r att de inte betalar ut vinsterna eller f?rsenar uttag, ?r det mer ?n po?ngen. ??
Du har dock r?tt; ju fler k?llor spelare str?var efter att s?ka, desto b?ttre, och vi har aldrig presenterat v?r webbplats som det enda s?ttet att bli bekant med kasinon.
N?r det kommer till svarta po?ng "tilldelas" dessa bara f?r ol?sta klagom?l, vilket vanligtvis inte ?r s?rskilt uppskattat. Men om du kollar n?gon casinorecension – inte bara numret – kommer du att se de senaste klagom?len direkt d?r, s? n?r du v?l uppt?cker ett ol?st klagom?l antar jag att det ?r en r?ttvis ledtr?d. Dessutom ing?r systersidor, som du kan se:
Jag f?rst?r att webbplatsen ?r mycket komplex, och att bl?ddra i alla recensioner, flikar eller till och med forum, eller f?rst? vad s?kerhetsindexet faktiskt betyder, ?r inte en l?tt uppgift.
Safety Index tar ocks? h?nsyn till kasinons skala, s? det som inte skulle p?verka ett st?rre internationellt kasino kan f?rst?ra ett mindre, lokalt onlinecasino baserat p? m?ngden svarta po?ng som delas ut.
Jag f?rst?r k?nslan av att varje s?kerhetsindex m?ste ?verensst?mma med den "allm?nna ?sikten". ?nd? skiljer sig erfarenheterna ?t; d?rf?r ?r det inte m?jligt att n? det m?let.
D?rf?r ber vi spelare att uttrycka sina erfarenheter – bra eller d?liga – p? forumet, genom recensioner och s? vidare.
S?g till om du vill f?rdjupa dig.
Hello, and thanks for the explanation. I should have started with the point explaining that I can add my or let's say demonstrate CG optics to that subject. My bad, sorry. ??
Well, I guess every player may use the whole internet to create an opinion on a casino. My colleagues, instead of that, consider evaluated situations. Based on our experiences with the external sources, we chose this way.
However, I know there is a person tracking external complaints—not TP reviews, because their policies are absurd. As long as they allow players to review Casino Guru for not paying out the winnings or delaying withdrawals, that's besides the point. ??
However, you are correct; the more sources players aim to seek, the better, and we have never presented our website as the only way to get familiar with casinos.
When it comes to black points, those are "awarded" only for unresolved complaints, which is not usually very appreciated. However, if you check any casino review—not just the number—you will see the latest complaints directly there, so once you spot an unresolved complaint, I guess it is a fair clue. Also, sister sides are included, as you can see:
I understand the website is very complex, and browsing all reviews, tabs, or even forums, or understanding what the Safety Index actually means, is not an easy task.
Safety Index also takes into consideration the casinos scale, so what would not affect a bigger international casino may ruin a smaller, local online casino based on the amount of the black points awarded.
I understand the feeling that each Safety Index needs to correspond with the "general opinion." Yet the experiences differ; hence, it is not possible to reach that goal.
Thus, we ask players to express their experiences—good or bad—on the forum, through the reviews, and so on.
Let me know if you want to delve deeper.
Automatiskt ?versatt:
