Myndigheten utf?rdar licensen, eftersom de f?r betalt f?r det. Sedan har man auktoriteter med olika f?rh?llningss?tt. Det finns myndigheter som ?r n?ra besl?ktade med den nationella regeringen. N?rhelst de utf?rdar en licens kan du lita p? dem. Men s? har man myndigheter som utf?rdar licensen till i princip alla som betalar f?r det.
Sedan beror allt p? casinot. Det finns fantastiska casinon med mycket kundv?nligt tillv?gag?ngss?tt som ?r licensierade p? Curacao eller s? har de inte ens n?gon licens. Men det ?r tack vare deras ledning, inte f?r att de beh?ver vara s?, f?r att de har licensen.
Till exempel har du kasinon som ?r licensierade i Costa Rica. Jag har aldrig h?rt talas om ett fall d?r en spelare kontaktade licensmyndigheten och de skulle till och med svara honom.
The authority issues the license, because they get paid for it. Then you have authorities with different approaches. There are authorities that are closely related to the national government. Whenever they issue a license, you can trust them. But then you have authorities that issues the license to basically anyone who pays for it.
Then it all depends on the casino. There are great casinos with very customer-friendly approach that are licensed in Curacao or they don't even have any license. But it's thanks to their management, not because they need to be like that, because they have the license.
For example you have casinos that are licensed in Costa Rica. I've never heard about a case where a player contacted the licensing authority and they would even reply to him.
Automatiskt ?versatt: