Bonjour, Je reviens après 2 ans pour vous faire part de la décision de la CEG pour un remboursement a mon égard de la part de Mr Bet.
K?ra chef och spelare,
Cura?ao eGaming ("CEG") har granskat all dokumentation som har l?mnats in av spelaren och operat?ren (de: "Parterna") i fr?gan om detta klagom?l. CEG erk?nner att b?da parter har f?tt gott om tid att kommunicera sina uttalanden och tillhandah?lla bevis som st?djer sina uttalanden.
I det h?r fallet d?mer CEG till operat?rens f?rdel eftersom:
Operat?ren, enligt CEG:s uppfattning, har agerat i enlighet med den offentliga informationen p? sin webbplats, som Operat?ren har h?nvisat till, samt l?mnat st?djande uttalanden.
Operat?ren har f?rsett CEG med relevanta bevis som visar att det finns IP-konflikt och/eller anv?ndning av samma enhet. Detta inneb?r att flera konton anv?nder samma IP och/eller enhet.
?ven om operat?ren har f?rsett CEG med ?vertygande bevis som kr?vs f?r att fatta sitt beslut, har den i detta specifika fall inte godk?nt att dela dessa bevis i konfidentialitets- och/eller bedr?gerif?rebyggande syfte.
CEG reglerar att tvisten mellan parterna ska l?sas enligt f?ljande:
Operat?ren ska ?terbetala spelarens senaste ins?ttningsbelopp.
Om parterna inte f?ljer denna dom kan det leda till disciplin?ra ?tg?rder fr?n CEG mot n?gon av parterna.
B?da parter kan ?verklaga detta beslut inom sju dagar till CEG:s ADR Appeals Commission. ?verklaganden som inte har mottagits i tid eller som inte inneh?ller korrekt identifiering, nya bevis och/eller motiv f?r ?verklagandet ska ignoreras.
V?nliga h?lsningar,
Cura?ao eGaming | ADR-avdelningen
Cura?ao eGaming har ?tagit sig att f?lja uppf?randekoden Responsible Gamin
g 2022 ("CCRG 2022"). L?s mer.

V?nligen verifiera att detta e-postmeddelande ?r fr?n Cura?ao eGaming ("CEG") genom att kontrollera att e-postadressen ?r: play


[email protected]
Bonjour, Je reviens après 2 ans pour vous faire part de la décision de la CEG pour un remboursement a mon égard de la part de Mr Bet.
Dear Executive and Player,
Cura?ao eGaming ("CEG") has reviewed all documentation that has been filed by the Player and the Operator (the: "Parties") in the matter of this complaint. CEG acknowledges that both parties have been granted ample time to communicate their statements and provide evidence, supporting their statements.
In this case, CEG rules in favour of the Operator because:
The Operator, in the view of CEG, has acted in accordance with the public information on its website, to which the Operator has referred to, as well as provided supporting statements.
The Operator has provided CEG with relevant evidence showing that there is IP-conflict and/or use of the same device. This means multiple accounts are using the same IP and/or device.
Although the Operator has provided CEG with convincing evidence required to make its ruling, in this specific case, it has not approved to share this evidence for confidentiality and/or fraud prevention purposes.
CEG rules that the dispute between parties shall be resolved as follows:
Operator to reimburse the Players last deposit amount.
Failure of parties to abide by this ruling may result in disciplinary action by CEG against any of the parties.
Both parties may file an appeal against this ruling within seven days with CEG’s ADR Appeals Commission. Appeals that have not been timely received or do not include proper identification, new evidence and/or motivation of the appeal shall be ignored.
Best regards,
Cura?ao eGaming | ADR Department
Cura?ao eGaming has committed to the Code of Conduct Responsible Gamin
g 2022 ("CCRG 2022"). Read more.

Please verify that this email is from Cura?ao eGaming ("CEG") by checking that the email address is: play


[email protected]
Automatiskt ?versatt: