God dag p? dig.
Jag uppskattar verkligen din ?ppenhet, och jag kommer att svara p? precis samma s?tt. ??
Dessutom vill jag tacka dig f?r att du l?ser n?gra av guiderna. Det ?r fantastiskt.
Vegasino – Jag hoppades p? en specifik incident, f?rst?r du, att s?ga "Det finns ingen v?rld d?r Vegasino ?r ett casino nummer ett. Det ?r inte hemskt, men det ?r l?ngt ifr?n det b?sta. Vilken aktiv spelare som helst skulle se det snabbt." s?ger egentligen ingenting konkret. Bara det, du ?r inte okej med det specifika numret som representerar s?kerhetsindexet.
Ta det ur mitt perspektiv en sekund – en ny medlem kommer till forumet och ifr?gas?tter s?kerhetsindexen och casinots topposition, och n?mner en d?lig upplevelse utan n?gra detaljer.
?rligt talat finns det inget konkret att till?gga, tyv?rr. L?t oss prata om detaljer, tack.
Kosmonaut – som ni ser ?r vi inte p? n?got s?tt Ask Gambler, men jag f?rst?r att spelare ?lskar att j?mf?ra, och vi uppmuntrar alla att f?lja s? m?nga webbplatser som m?jligt som recenserar casinon. Men vi h?ller fast vid v?r metod, liksom AG, LCB och CM. N?v?l, l?t oss fokusera p? klagom?let:
Det har slutat som ol?st; det ?r sant, men tyv?rr var beloppet f?r l?gt f?r att s?kerhetsindexet skulle kunna sjunka. Det l?ter f?rmodligen konstigt men ?r logiskt f?r mig. Varje ol?st klagom?l resulterar i att po?ng tilldelas det aktuella casinot. Beloppet beror p? problemets allvar. D?rf?r beh?vs mer ?n ett f?tal ol?sta klagom?l. Enkelt uttryckt garanterar inte ett enda ol?st klagom?l ogiltig betalning till varje spelare. Ist?llet f?r att till?mpa en s?dan metod skulle vi kunna hoppa ?ver all information om casinon och markera dem alla som antingen bra eller d?liga. Denna metod ?r enligt v?r mening inte den mest effektiva.
Kommer ni ih?g n?r jag pratade om fyra informationsk?llor? Tack vare er kan de andra hitta det ol?sta fallet innan de best?mmer sig f?r att g? in p? casinot.
Lita p? mig, jag f?rst?r din synvinkel. Det m?ste vara sv?rt att acceptera att vi inte kunde hj?lpa till, och att casinot fortfarande ligger "?ver genomsnittet". Inte bland bra casinon dock. ?nd? ?r det matematik och ett systematiskt tillv?gag?ngss?tt, och jag f?rst?r om du inte h?ller med om resultatet. Ur ditt perspektiv kanske det inte ?r s?rskilt bekv?mt.
Jag tittade dock just p? antalet ?ppna klagom?l som har skickats in, och jag f?rv?ntar mig att casinots betyg kommer att sjunka n?r alla ?r markerade som ol?sta. Baserat p? datumet f?r uttagsinl?mningen verkar det som att casinot har varit oansvarigt p? ett tag, vilket i princip st?mmer ?verens med din situation.
De verkar i alla fall inte vara nya spelare.
Good day to you.
I greatly appreciate your openness, and I will respond in the very same manner. ??
Furthermore, let me thank you for reading some of the guides. That's extraordinary.
Vegasino - I was hoping for a specific incident, you see, saying, "There’s no world in which Vegasino is a number one casino. It’s not terrible, but it’s very far from the best. Any active player would see that quickly." actually says nothing concrete. Just that, you are not okay with the specific number representing the safety index.
Take it from my perspective for a sec - a new member comes to the forum questioning the Safety Indexes and the casino's top position, mentioning a bad experience without any detail.
With all honesty, there is nothing concrete to add, I'm afraid. Let's talk details, please.
Kosmonaut - as you can see, we are not Ask Gambler by any means, but I understand players love to compare, and we encourage everyone to track as many sites reviewing casinos. But we stick with our methodology, so do the AG, LCB, and CM. Well, let's focus on the complaint:
It has ended like unresolved; that's true, yet sadly the amount was too low for the Safety Index to go lower. It probably sounds weird but makes sense to me. Every unresolved complaint results in points being awarded to the casino in question. The amount depends on the severity of the issue. Therefore, more than a few unresolved complaints are needed. To put it simply, a single unresolved complaint does not guarantee voided payment to every player. Instead of applying such an approach, we could skip all the information about casinos and mark them all as either good or bad. This approach, in our opinion, is not the most effective.
Remember when I talked about four information sources? Thanks to you, the others may find the unresolved case before they decide to enter the casino.
Trust me that I understand your point of view. It must be hard to accept that we could not help, and the casino is still in "above average". Not among good casinos, however. Yet it is math and a systematic approach, and I get it if you disagree with the outcome. From your perspective, it may not be very convenient.
However, I just looked at the quantity of open complaints that have been submitted, and I anticipate that the casino's rating will drop once all of them are marked as unresolved. Based on the date of the withdrawal submission, it seems that the casino has been unresponsive for some time, which essentially fits your situation.
At least those do not seem like new players.
Automatiskt ?versatt:
