Din anv?ndning av v?ra webbplatser/tj?nster utg?r ditt samtycke till v?ra cookies.L?s merGodk?nn
HemKlagom?lGGBet Casino - Spelarens konto blockeras och uttag nekades.
GGBet Casino - Spelarens konto blockeras och uttag nekades.
Automatiskt ?versatt:
Belopp:
460 €
GGBet Casino
S?kerhetsindex:V?ldigt h?gt
S?kerhetsindex
I enlighet med v?r granskningsmetodik har vi ber?knat casinots s?kerhetsindex baserat p? ?ver 20 faktorer, inklusive casinots ekonomi, sk?ligheten hos villkoren, spelarklagom?l och annat. Ju h?gre s?kerhetsindex, desto troligare ?r det att du f?r ut dina vinster utan n?gra problem.
The player from Nigeria had his account blocked due to an alleged violation of clause 10.1.4. Even though he submitted proof that all payment methods were his and passed KYC checks, his withdrawal was blocked. He had been a player for over a month, playing Roulette Live, and had deposited a total of 1,960 Euros. The casino claimed he had been involved in activities related to money laundering, observing a pattern of him depositing funds, placing low-risk bets, and then withdrawing funds. The player denied these allegations, arguing that his play style was legal and common to other casinos where he had not experienced any issues. However, after reviewing the evidence and additional details provided by the casino, we concluded that the complaint had been unjustified as there were reasonable grounds to believe the account had been engaged in suspicious activity. The casino's decision to cancel the player's withdrawal and block his account was accepted.
Spelaren fr?n Nigeria fick sitt konto blockerat p? grund av en p?st?dd ?vertr?delse av klausul 10.1.4. Trots att han l?mnade in bevis p? att alla betalningsmetoder var hans och godk?nde KYC-kontroller, blockerades hans uttag. Han hade varit spelare i ?ver en m?nad, spelat Roulette Live och hade satt in totalt 1 960 euro. Kasinot h?vdade att han hade varit inblandad i aktiviteter relaterade till penningtv?tt och observerat ett m?nster d?r han satte in pengar, placerade l?griskspel och sedan tog ut pengar. Spelaren f?rnekade dessa anklagelser och h?vdade att hans spelstil var laglig och vanlig p? andra kasinon d?r han inte hade upplevt n?gra problem. Men efter att ha granskat bevisen och ytterligare detaljer som kasinot l?mnat drog vi slutsatsen att klagom?let var ober?ttigat eftersom det fanns rimliga sk?l att tro att kontot hade varit inblandat i misst?nkt aktivitet. Kasinots beslut att avbryta spelarens uttag och blockera hans konto godk?ndes.
Jag fick ett e-postmeddelande om att mitt konto var blockerat enligt paragraf 10.1.4 i reglerna som s?ger:
" 10.1.4. delta i alla kriminella aktiviteter inklusive penningtv?tt och annan aktivitet med brottsliga konsekvenser "
Jag har skickat n?dv?ndiga bevis till GGBET som visar att alla betalningsmetoder som anv?nds p? plattformen tillh?r mig.
Det roliga ?r att uttaget jag gjorde innan det h?r drogs tillbaka tills jag passerade KYC, vilket jag gjorde och mina pengar sl?pptes, men n?sta blockerades och jag ?ndrade inte n?gon av mina betalningsmetoder
I got an email that my account was blocked according to clause 10.1.4 of the rules which states :
" 10.1.4. taking part in any criminal activities including money laundering and any other activity with criminal consequences "
I've sent the necessary proof to GGBET that showa that all payment methods used on the plat form belongs to me.
The funny thing is that the withdrawal I made befroe this one was witheld till I passed the KYC, which I did and my funds was released, but the next one was blocked, and I didn't change any of my payment methods
Tack s? mycket, isikalujoshua01, f?r att du tillhandah?ller den n?dv?ndiga informationen. Jag kommer nu att ?verf?ra ditt klagom?l till min kollega Branislav ( [email protected] ) som kommer att st? till din tj?nst. Jag ?nskar dig lycka till och hoppas att problemet kommer att l?sas till din bel?tenhet inom en snar framtid.
Thank you very much, isikalujoshua01, for providing the necessary information. I will now transfer your complaint to my colleague Branislav ([email protected]) who will be at your service. I wish you the best of luck and hope the problem will be resolved to your satisfaction in the near future.
Fr?n och med nu kommer jag att hj?lpa dig att l?sa ditt problem.
Innan jag bjuder in casinot till tr?den vill jag st?lla n?gra fr?gor till dig f?r att klarg?ra situationen.
Vilken/vilka betalningsmetoder anv?nde du f?r ins?ttningar och vilka betalningsmetoder anv?nde du f?r uttag?
Blev dina insatta medel fullt ut i spel p? kasinot (i enlighet med AML-reglerna)?
Vilken typ av satsningar gjorde du mest i roulettespel? ?r det m?jligt att du endast gjort l?grisksatsningar i Live Roulette-spel f?r att uppfylla de obligatoriska oms?ttningskraven f?r ins?ttningen/ins?ttningarna och sedan beg?rde uttag direkt efter ett s?dant spel, samtidigt som du upprepade denna process?
Finns det en chans att en annan anv?ndare/konto anv?nde samma internetanslutning/IP/enhet f?r att komma ?t kasinot? Om ja, ?r det m?jligt att ett potentiellt l?nkat konto spelade samma spel samtidigt som du eller att kasinot p? n?got s?tt kunde l?nka ditt omtvistade konto till en annan spelare/anv?ndare?
Observera att onlinekasinon ocks? kan koppla ihop spelare genom att kontrollera deras betalningsmetoder/kontoutdrag under verifieringsprocessen - misst?nkta transaktioner mellan ?garna av m?jliga l?nkade kasinokonton p? deras kontoutdrag.
Hello, isikalujoshua01,
From now on, I will assist you in resolving your issue.
Before I invite the casino to the thread, I would like to ask you a few questions to clarify the situation.
What payment method(s) did you use for deposits, and what payment method(s) did you use for withdrawal(s)?
Were your deposited funds fully put into play at the casino (in compliance with AML rules)?
What kind of bets did you make in Roulette games most? Is it possible that you made only low-risk bets in Live Roulette games to meet the mandatory wagering requirements for the deposit(s) and then requested withdrawal(s) immediately after such a play, while repeating this process?
Is there a chance that another user/account used the same internet connection/IP/device to access the casino? If yes, is it possible that a potentially linked account played the same games at the same time as you or that the casino could somehow link your disputed account with another player(s)/user(s)?
Please note that online casinos are also able to connect players by checking their payment methods/bank statements during the verification process - suspicious transactions between the owners of possible linked casino accounts in their bank statements.
lokal bank?verf?ring f?r ins?ttningar, usdt f?r uttag
ja, du kan inte dra ut f?rr?n du uppfyller oms?ttningskraven, annars betalar du b?ter
typ (jag spelar s?kert, jag drar mig efter att ha uppfyllt oms?ttningskraven f?r att ta vinst eller minimera f?rluster, innan jag g?r igen, det ?r s? jag alltid har spelat, det spelar ingen roll om kraven ?r 2x eller 10x)
Nej
det borde inte vara ett problem.
Verifiering p? deras plattform g?rs bara n?r det kr?vs, och efter att ha gjort flera uttag h?lls ett av mina uttag och jag blev tillsagd att skicka in dokument f?r verifiering, vilket jag gjorde, mitt konto godk?ndes och uttaget sl?pptes n?sta uttag efter det var vad som h?lls, och jag spelade fortfarande samma spel p? samma s?tt.
Hello Branislav
local bank transfer for deposits, usdt for withdrawals
yes, you can't withdraw till you meet the wager requirements , otherwise you pay a fine
kinda (I play safe, i do withdraw after meeting the wagering requirements to take profit or minimize losses, before I go again, thats how i've always played, dosen't matter if the requirements is 2x or 10x)
no
that shouldn't be a problem.
Verification on their platform is only done when required, and after making multiple withdrawals, one of my withdrawals was held and I was told to submit documents for verification, which I did, my account was appproved and the withdrawal was released the next withdrawal after that was what was held, and I still played the same game the same way.
Tack f?r ytterligare information. Observera dock att det ?r extremt misst?nkt om du s?tter in med en betalningsmetod och tar ut med en annan, speciellt om vi pratar om uttag till en krypto-e-pl?nbok.
Om du spelade dina ins?ttningar som minimum, bara f?r att uppfylla de obligatoriska oms?ttningskraven f?r ins?ttningarna, och sedan omedelbart tog ut vinsterna, flera g?nger, indikerar det ett brott mot AML-reglerna.
Men l?t oss nu fr?ga casinot om detaljer och en f?rklaring.
B?sta GGBet Casino Team ,
Kan du ge oss en mer detaljerad f?rklaring av spelarens situation? Vilka steg ska spelaren vidta f?r att avblockera kontot och ta ut sina vinster?
Om vi talar om ett brott mot casinots regler och villkor, kan casinot underbygga sitt beslut med relevanta bevis? Vad begick han?
Skicka g?rna de n?dv?ndiga bevisen till min e-postadress ([email protected] ).
Tack p? f?rhand f?r att du l?mnar informationen.
Alright, isikalujoshua01.
Thank you for additional details. However, please note it is extremely suspicious if you deposit by one payment method and withdraw by another, especially if we are talking about withdrawing to a crypto e-wallet.
If you played your deposits at minimum, just to meet the mandatory wagering requirements for the deposits, and then you immediately withdrew the winnings, several times, it indicates a breach of AML rules.
However, let's now ask the casino for details and an explanation.
Dear GGBet Casino Team,
Could you please provide us with an explanation of the player's situation in more detail? What steps should the player take to unblock the account and withdraw his winnings?
If we are talking about a breach of the casino's Terms and Conditions, is the casino able to substantiate its decision with relevant evidence? What did he commit?
Feel free to send the necessary evidence to my email address ([email protected]).
Thank you in advance for providing the information.
Tack f?r att du kontaktar oss. Vi beklagar att informera dig om att ditt konto visade sig vara inblandat i aktiviteter relaterade till penningtv?tt, vilket ?r ett brott mot v?ra villkor, s?rskilt paragraf 10.1.4.
Efter en noggrann granskning uppt?cktes att ett m?nster av att s?tta in pengar, placera l?grisksatsningar och d?refter ta ut pengar, vilket v?ckte misstankar om bedr?glig aktivitet. Detta m?nster ?verensst?mde med liknande beteende som observerats fr?n andra anv?ndare i Nigeria.
Vi tar fr?gor som r?r bedr?geri och penningtv?tt p? st?rsta allvar, och som ett resultat av detta har ditt konto blockerats i enlighet med v?ra policyer. Vi har inlett en utredning i detta ?rende och alla relevanta bevis kommer att vidarebefordras till [email protected] .
Hi everyone!
Dear Joshua,
Thank you for reaching out to us. We regret to inform you that your account was found to be involved in activities related to money laundering, which is a violation of our terms and conditions, specifically clause 10.1.4.
Upon thorough review, it was observed that a pattern of depositing funds, placing low-risk bets, and subsequently withdrawing funds was detected, which raised suspicions of fraudulent activity. This pattern was consistent with similar behavior observed from other users in Nigeria.
We take matters related to fraud and money laundering very seriously, and as a result, your account has been blocked in accordance with our policies. We have initiated an investigation into this matter, and all relevant evidence will be forwarded to [email protected].
R?cker kasinots f?rklaring f?r dig, s? att jag kan betrakta ?rendet avslutat, eller ska jag v?nta p? relevant bevis fr?n kasinot?
Kasinot har inte vidarebefordrat de utlovade bevisen till min e-post ?nnu. Men om casinots uttalanden ovan ?r korrekta och sanna, och casinot kan st?dja dem med relevanta bevis, ?r det v?rt att ?gna mer tid ?t saken och v?nta p? dessa bevis?
Dear isikalujoshua01,
Can you please confirm the above-stated?
Is the casino's explanation enough for you, so I can consider the matter closed, or should I wait for the relevant evidence from the casino?
The casino has not forwarded the promised evidence to my email yet. But, if the casino's statements above are correct and true, and the casino can support them with relevant evidence, is it worth devoting more time to the matter and waiting for that evidence?
Nej, f?rklaringen ?r inte bra nog Branislav, jag v?ntade p? att se vad de skulle tillhandah?lla som bevis innan jag svarade.
Termen l?grisksatsning f?r mig ?r relativ eftersom 50 euro p? ODD/J?MN l?t oss inte gl?mma att NOLL ?r inte precis l?grisk. Men l?t oss gl?mma att termen h?r ?r "l?grisk", GGBET h?ller med mig om att det fanns en m?jlighet att jag skulle f?rlora min insats f?r varje spel oavsett hur liten en s?dan m?jlighet var. S? mina insatser var giltiga.
N?r det g?ller ins?ttning, spel och uttag, det ?r bara s? jag spelar, det ?r en del av vad jag kallar mina engagemangsregler, det jag anv?nder f?r att undvika att f?rlora allt, och jag vill p?peka att jag inte bara spela s? h?r p? GGBET, jag skulle kunna ta med mig som fyra andra kasinon som jag spelade p? med samma regler var och en med mycket mer pengar ?n GGBET, varje konto ?r fortfarande giltigt. vissa med olika spel, men ett samma spel som GGBET samma strategi, har till och med 10x oms?ttningskrav j?mf?rt med GGBETs 2x oms?ttningskrav, och jag har inga problem med mina konton. Om du beh?ver bevis skickar jag sk?rmdumpar.
P? m?nstret ?verensst?mde med liknande beteende observerats fr?n andra anv?ndare i Nigeria, inte s?ker p? vad man ska kalla detta, skyldig genom att vara fr?n samma land? eftersom du m?ste f?rst? Branislav. Jag tvivlar p? att GGBET finns p? listan ?ver de 30 b?sta bookmakerna i mitt land, jag hittade dem av en slump. Nu tycker jag att det m?ste tro att av alla spel p? GGBET, b?de sportavdelningen och kasinot, att d?r m?nniskor fr?n mitt land som spelade samma spel var jag p? samma s?tt som jag var.
Enligt deras uttalande var s?ttet jag gjorde ins?ttningar p? och spelade inte ens problemet, det faktum att jag ?r fr?n Nigeria ?r det. Det ?r bara profilering.
Jag ?r inte insatt i deras (GGBET)-system, s? jag kan inte bekr?fta om det de (GGBET) s?ger ?r sant, men vad ?r det jag ?r en Cyber Security-analytiker under utbildning, s? jag f?rst?r att det m?ste vara efterlevnad av AML, men jag vet ocks? att det finns rutiner att f?lja.
Senast jag kontrollerade att det var oskyldigt tills motsatsen bevisats, och det ?r d?r mitt problem ligger med GGBET, om du misst?nker att n?gon har tv?ttat pengar ligger det v?l inom din r?tt att sp?rra personens konto, men det ?r ocks? personens r?tt att f?rsvara sig, men de (GGBET) gav inget utrymme f?r s?dana.
S? vad hindrar dem fr?n att bara blockera folks konton och anklaga dem f?r penningtv?tt n?r de (GGBET) vill g?ra vinst.
Och h?r ?r de mest f?rvirrande delarna:
?ven om de (GGBET) kan s?ga att de hade problem med min spelstil, ?r det helt lagligt f?r mig att spela p? det s?ttet, det finns inga regler som s?ger att jag inte kan spela "l?grisk"-spel.
R?tta mig om jag har fel men penningtv?tt sist jag kontrollerade handlar om var dina pengar kommer ifr?n och vart de g?r till, och de (GGBET) verifierade mina ins?ttnings- och uttagsmetoder innan de godk?nde uttaget jag gjorde f?re detta, s? de vet att bankkontot och pl?nboken jag anv?nder tillh?r mig, de (GGBET) kan bekr?fta detta. S? om de (GGBET) vet att mina ins?ttningar och uttag kom fr?n och till mig, varf?r anklagar jag mig f?r att tv?tta pengar?
Hello Branislav,
Trust you’ve been good.
No, the explanation is not good enough Branislav, I was waiting to see what they would provide as evidence before I replied.
The term low-risk bet to me is relative cause 50 euro on ODD/EVEN let’s not forget ZERO is not exactly low risk. But let’s forget that, the term here is "low-risk", GGBET would agree with me that there was a possibility of me losing my wager for every game no matter how small such a possibility was. So, my bets were valid.
On the matter of depositing, playing and withdrawing, that’s just how I play, it’s part of what I term my rules of engagement, it what I use to avoid losing it all, and I would like to point out that I don’t just play like this on GGBET, I could bring like four other casinos which I played on with the same rules each with way more money than GGBET, each account still valid. some with different games, but one the same game as GGBET same strategy, even has 10x wagering requirements compared to GGBETs 2x wagering requirement, and I have no issues with my accounts. If you require proof I’ll send screenshots.
On the pattern was consistent with similar behavior observed from other users in Nigeria, not sure what to call this, guilty by being from the same country? because you have to understand Branislav I doubt GGBET is in the list of top 30 bookies in my country, I found them by accident. Now I find it had to believe that out of all the games on GGBET, both the sport section and casino, that there where people from my country playing the same game I was the same way I was.
According to their statement the way I deposited and played wasn’t even the issue, the fact that I am from Nigeria is. That’s is just profiling.
I’m not privy to their (GGBET) system, so I can’t confirm if what they (GGBET) are saying is true, but what is I’m a Cyber Security analyst in training, so I do understand that there has to be compliance to AML, but I also know that there are procedures to follow.
Last I checked its innocent until proven guilty, and that is where my problem lies with GGBET, if you suspect one of laundering money its well within your rights to block said persons account, but its also the persons right to defend his or herself, but they (GGBET) did not provide any room for such.
So what’s stopping them from just blocking peoples accounts and accusing them of money laundering when they (GGBET) want to turn a profit.
And here are the most confusing parts:
While they (GGBET) can say they had a problem with my play style, its completely legal for me to play that way, there are no rules stating I can’t play "low-risk" games.
Correct me if I’m wrong but money laundering last I checked is about where your money is coming from and where its going to, and they (GGBET) verified my deposit and withdrawal methods before approving the withdrawal I made before this one, so they know that the bank account and wallet I use belong to me, they (GGBET) can confirm this. So, if they (GGBET) know that my deposits and withdrawals were from and to me, why accuse me of laundering money?
Tack, isikalujoshua01. Jag uppskattar din uppskattning.
Bara en anm?rkning till ang?ende ett s?dant spels?tt - till exempel omedelbart uttag efter att ha uppfyllt de obligatoriska oms?ttningskraven och s?tta in nya pengar p? ditt konto upprepade g?nger (s?rskilt fr?n en annan betalningsmetod ?n som anv?ndes f?r uttag) trots att du har tillr?ckligt med saldo f?r att forts?tta spela indikerar tydliga tecken p? brott mot AML-reglerna och inneb?r att en s?dan spelare inte spelar f?r underh?llning. Om vi pratar om brott mot AML-regler beh?ver det inte bara vara med penningtv?tt. Det finns flera anledningar till varf?r spelare spelar p? ett s?dant s?tt.
Tyv?rr har jag inte f?tt de beg?rda bevisen ?nnu. S? l?t oss fr?ga casinot om detaljerna igen.
B?sta GGBet Casino Team ,
Kan du skicka mig de relevanta bevisen du n?mnde ovan?
Thank you, isikalujoshua01. I appreciate your appreciation.
Only one more note regarding such a way of play - for example, immediate withdrawing after meeting the deposit mandatory wagering requirements, and depositing new funds to your account repeatedly (especially from a different payment method than was used for withdrawals) despite having enough balance to continue playing indicate clear signs of AML rules violation, and means that such a player does not play for entertainment. If we are talking about AML rules violation, it does not have to be only with money laundering. There are several reasons why players play in such a way.
Unfortunately, I have not been provided with the requested evidence yet. So let's ask the casino for the details once again.
Dear GGBet Casino Team,
Can you please forward me the relevant evidence you mentioned above?
Jag kan bekr?fta att alla relevanta bevis har vidarebefordrats till den angivna e-postadressen. Meddela oss om du beh?ver ytterligare hj?lp eller f?rtydliganden ang?ende den tillhandah?llna informationen.
Hello,
I can confirm that all the relevant evidence has been forwarded to the provided email address. Please let us know if you need any further assistance or clarification regarding the information provided.
Jag skulle vilja vara medveten om bevisen, men om det inte ?r m?jligt, inga problem.
N?r det g?ller ditt exempel ovan kan kumuleringen av de 3 sk?len ovan leda till brott mot AML-reglerna och du anv?nde ett s?dant exempel som en referens till mitt fall eftersom de ?r ganska lika.
Den f?rsta anledningen
"Omedelbart uttag efter att ha uppfyllt de obligatoriska ins?ttningskraven"
p? egen hand ?r inte ett problem, eftersom jag f?rklarade att det ?r mina personliga spelregler, men i kombination med de f?ljande 2 sk?len skulle det g?ra ett argument f?r brott mot AML-reglerna.
Det andra sk?let
"S?tt in nya pengar p? ditt konto upprepade g?nger trots att du har tillr?ckligt med saldo f?r att forts?tta spela"
G?ller inte mitt fall, som du kan se fr?n min bifogade sk?rmdump tog jag ut pengarna p? mitt konto, innan jag gjorde en ins?ttning igen och gick en ny runda n?r jag ville spela n?sta g?ng.
N?r det g?ller det tredje sk?let
"S?tta in nya pengar p? ditt konto upprepade g?nger, s?rskilt fr?n en annan betalningsmetod ?n som anv?ndes f?r uttag"
Det h?r ?r vad jag ?r medveten om brukar flagga som brott mot AML-regler, felet ligger hos GG.BET, om du ?r bekant med GG.BET:s system vet du att inte alla ins?ttningsmetoder som finns tillg?ngliga p? ins?ttningssidan ?r tillg?ngliga som en uttagsmetod p? uttagssidan.
Jag hade en v?n som ?ppnade ett konto ?t mig s? att jag kunde f? dessa sk?rmdumpar.
Fr?n och med idag ?r detta GG.BET:s ins?ttningssida
Detta ?r uttagssidan
Du kan se skillnaden. Det har till och med blivit v?rre fr?n n?r jag fortfarande var aktiv, ?tminstone d? var Skrill, Neteller och Crypto tillg?ngliga f?r uttag. Om jag skulle spela p? GG.BET:s sajt idag skulle de g?ngbara ins?ttningsalternativen vara ett av kryptoalternativen och f?r uttag skulle vara Jeton wallet, som f?r ?vrigt har en 2% transaktionsavgift och minsta uttag p? 200 euro.
Detta ?r en sk?rmdump av min transaktionssida fr?n wild.io.
Jag spelade samma spel, p? samma s?tt som jag spelade p? GG.BET h?r, summan jag gjorde transaktioner h?r var ungef?r 3 g?nger s? mycket som jag gjorde p? GG.BET, jag hade faktiskt till och med vinster fr?n wild.io och det ?r med deras 10x oms?ttningskrav ?r mitt konto fortfarande aktivt till idag som du kan se, har aldrig haft n?gra problem med det, ?ven om jag har slutat spela.
Och Branislavs sammanfattning av ditt fall s?ger "p?st?tt brott mot klausul 10.1.4", men det ?r huvudfr?gan h?r, det fanns inga anklagelser, jag fick inte utrymme f?r n?gon form av f?rsvar, jag fick bara besked om domen, att deras s? kallas "team" som de betalar, vars l?n eller bonusar f?rmodligen beror p? hur mycket pengar de kan f? fr?n flaggande konton, samma team som verifierade min KYC och k?lla och destination f?r medel, att samma team sa att jag var skyldig till att ?verf?ra pengar . Det har g?tt ?ver ett ?r och ?rligt talat s? ?r det fortfarande inte meningsfullt n?r jag t?nker p? det, f?r jag menar att det m?ste ske en korrekt process, vad h?nde med hej Branislav v?rt system flaggade dig f?r penningtv?tt s? vi har blockerat din konto beh?ver vi att du ger bevis p? att denna fond ?r din och att du ?r den som tar emot dem.
Jag menar vem tv?ttar 1 464 euro?
Hello Branislav,
I would like to be privy to the evidence provided, but if that’s not possible, no problem.
As for your example above, the cumulation of the 3 reasons above could lead to AML rules violations and you used such an example as a reference to my case because they are quite similar.
The first reason
"Immediate withdrawing after meeting the deposit mandatory wagering requirements "
on its own is not an issue, as I explained that’s my personal rules of playing, but combined withe the next 2 reasons would make a case for AML rules violation.
The second reason
"Depositing new funds to your account repeatedly despite having enough balance to continue playing"
Does not apply to my case, as you’ll see from my attached screenshot I withdrew the funds in my account, before depositing again and going for another round when next I wanted to play.
As for the third reason
"Depositing new funds to your account repeatedly especially from a different payment method than was used for withdrawals"
This is what I’m aware usually flags as AML rules violation, the fault lies with GG.BET, if you’re familiar with GG.BET’s system you’ll know that not every deposit method available on the deposit page is available as a withdrawal method on the withdrawal page.
I had a friend open an account for me so I could get these screenshots.
As of today, this is GG.BET’s deposit page
This is the withdrawal page
You can see the difference. It has even gotten worse from when I was still active, at least back then Skrill, Neteller and Crypto were available for withdrawal. If I was to play on GG.BET’s site today, the viable deposit options would be one of the crypto options and for withdrawal would be Jeton wallet, which by the way has a 2% transaction fee and minimum withdrawal of 200 euros.
This is a screenshot of my transaction page from wild.io.
I played the same game, the same way as I played on GG.BET here, the amount of money I transacted here was ‘bout 3 times the amount I did on GG.BET, I actually even had profits from wild.io and that’s with their 10x wagering requirement, my account is still active till today as you can see, never had any issues with it, though I’ve since quit gambling.
And Branislav your case summary says "alleged breach of clause 10.1.4", but that’s the main issue here there was no allegation, I wasn’t given room for any sort of defence, I was just notified the of verdict, that their so called "team" which they pay, whose salary or bonuses probably hangs on how much funds they could get from flagging accounts, the same team which verified my KYC and source and destination of funds, that that same team said I was guilty of transferring money. Its’s been over a year an honestly speaking it still doesn’t make sense anytime I think ‘bout it, because I mean there has to be due process, what happened to hey Branislav our system flagged you for money laundering so we’ve blocked your account, we need you to provide proof that this fund is yours and that you’re the one receiving them.
Dina spelloggar och transaktionshistorik fr?n december 2022 visar delvis alla tecken som du f?rs?kte f?rtydliga separat. Det ?r dock fortfarande inte klart vad du kunde ha vunnit p? att spela p? ett s?dant s?tt.
D?rf?r bad jag casinot om ytterligare f?rklaring/detaljer, och m?jlig l?sning.
B?sta GGBet Casino ,
Tack s? mycket f?r ditt e-postmeddelande och ytterligare data.
Skulle du kunna titta p? mitt senaste e-postmeddelande ang?ende ?rendet och svara p? mina fr?gor?
Greetings all,
I am sorry for the delay.
Dear isikalujoshua01,
Your game logs and transaction history from December 2022 shows partially all the signs you tried to clarify separately. However, it is still not clear what you could have gained by playing in such a way.
Therefore, I asked the casino for additional explanation/details, and possible solution.
Dear GGBet Casino,
Thank you very much for your email and the additional data.
Could you please look at my last email regarding the matter and answer my questions?
B?ste Branislav , jag har tagit emot ditt meddelande och har redan kontaktat v?r riskavdelning f?r att samla in ytterligare information om ?rendet. Jag kommer att ge dig ett svar s? snart som m?jligt.
Hello everyone,
Dear Branislav, I have received your message and have already contacted our risk department to gather additional information regarding the matter. I will provide you with a response as soon as possible.
Jag skickade ytterligare information om din f?rfr?gan f?r n?gra dagar sedan, v?nligen kontrollera din e-post. Om du beh?ver n?got mer, kontakta mig g?rna.
Hi Branislav,
I sent additional information regarding your request a few days ago, please check your email. If you need anything else, feel free to contact me.
Efter att ha samlat in all n?dv?ndig information och detaljer fr?n kasinot beslutade vi att avsluta detta klagom?l som omotiverat. Det finns rimliga sk?l att tro att ditt konto var involverat i misst?nkt aktivitet och inte anv?ndes f?r spel?ndam?l, eller det finns till och med tecken p? m?jlig penningtv?tt och anv?ndning av flera konton. Kasinot agerade i enlighet med sina villkor och vi accepterar dess beslut att avbryta ditt uttag och blockera ditt kasinokonto.
Om du inte ?r n?jd med klagom?lsl?sningen rekommenderar jag att du konsulterar spelmyndigheten som reglerar casinot. Vid fr?gor, skriv g?rna till mig p? [email protected] .
Tack s? mycket, GGBet Casino Team, f?r att du tillhandah?ller information och f?r ditt samarbete.
V?nliga h?lsningar,
Branislav, www.kpvfaw.com
Dear isikalujoshua01,
After gathering all the necessary information and details from the casino, we decided to close this complaint as unjustified. There are reasonable grounds to believe that your account was engaging in suspicious activity and was not used for gaming purposes, or there are even signs of possible money laundering and multiple accounts use. The casino acted in accordance with its terms and conditions, and we accept its decision to cancel your withdrawal and block your casino account.
If you are not satisfied with the complaint solution, I recommend you consult the gambling authority that regulates the casino. In case of any questions, feel free to write to me at [email protected].
Thank you very much, GGBet Casino Team, for providing information and for your cooperation.
www.kpvfaw.com ?r en oberoende k?lla till information om onlinecasinon och onlinecasinospel, som inte kontrolleras av n?gon speloperat?r eller n?gra andra institutioner. Alla v?ra recensioner och guider skapas med st?rsta objektivitet och ?rlighet, efter b?sta k?nnedom och bed?mning av medlemmarna i v?rt oberoende expertteam. De ?r emellertid endast avsedda som informationsunderlag och ska varken tolkas som, eller anses vara, r?dgivning i juridisk mening. Du ska alltid sj?lv s?kerst?lla att du uppfyller alla r?ttsliga skyldigheter innan du spelar p? ett utvalt casino.