H?lsningar alla,
Tack, MyStake-teamet , f?r ert e-postmeddelande och f?r att ni har tillhandah?llit st?djande information.
K?ra jace_18 ,
Tack f?r ditt mejl med ytterligare information ocks?. Jag ?r dock inte s?ker p? vad du f?rs?kte s?ga med den bifogade sk?rmdumpen, och med tanke p? alla detaljer som casinot tillhandah?llit, trots att du f?rs?kte klarg?ra situationen och omst?ndigheterna, ?r det tyv?rr inte s?rskilt logiskt.
Jag skulle vilja f?rklara n?gra saker och har n?gra fler fr?gor till dig.
Du fr?gade varf?r matchningar i IP-adresser och spel med andra anv?ndare anses vara bedr?gerier.
Med tanke p? de n?mnda datamatchningarna (f?rutom andra matchningar som av f?rst?eliga sk?l inte n?mndes i tr?den), f?rest?ll dig en exempelsituation -> Det ?r till?tet att endast ?ga 1 konto per anv?ndare/IP/hush?ll/adress/etc. Detsamma g?ller bonusar - endast 1 bonus per anv?ndare/konto ?r till?ten (l?t oss s?ga en v?lkomstbonus). Vi pratar om branschstandardregler, och det ?r helt okej att casinona beh?ver skydda sig p? detta s?tt, mot bedragare och missbrukare, och spelare accepterar dessa regler under registreringen. Sedan, under verifieringen, tar casinot reda p? dessa datamatchningar (till exempel IP-adresser och spelmatchningar mellan 2 eller fler konton), vilka anv?nde bonusar - och jag pratar inte om andra matchningar nu.
I ett s?dant fall, n?r det finns flera datamatchningar mellan de l?nkade kontona, till och med speluppl?gget och de spelade spelen, och det inte spelar n?gon roll n?r IP-matchningen intr?ffade, eller att kontona registrerades fr?n olika fysiska adresser, indikerar det starkt flera konton - mer ?n ett konto som anv?nds av en anv?ndare, vilket ?r str?ngt f?rbjudet p? alla onlinekasinon, s?rskilt om de l?nkade kontona anv?nde bonusar, eftersom det ocks? bryter mot bonusreglerna (bonusmissbruk, eftersom samma typ av bonus anv?ndes mer ?n en g?ng per spelare). D?rf?r ?r anv?ndaren inte ber?ttigad till vinster som erh?llits p? ett s?dant s?tt, s?rskilt inte om vinsterna ackumulerades fr?n en bonus. Dessutom ?r det om?jligt att, efter att en s?dan situation uppt?ckts, ?ven KYC/verifiera.
Om det finns matchningar i data mellan konton, som n?mnts ovan, kan casinot inte verifiera om 1 anv?ndare anv?nde de l?nkade kontona, och n?gon av ?garna till s?dana konton kan inte bevisa att de l?nkade kontona inte anv?ndes av en person. D?rf?r finns det regler som f?rbjuder mer ?n 1 konto och mer ?n 1 bonus per anv?ndare/IP/hush?ll/etc., och d?rf?r anses s?dana datamatchningar vara bedr?gliga.
Nu – din specifika situation.
Tyv?rr, ?ven om du k?nner till ett annat konto (din syster som spelar p? samma casino), bekr?ftar uppgifterna fr?n casinot tydligt att det finns minst tv? andra konton kopplade till ditt, genom specifika och osannolika datamatchningar (vilket skulle vara en slump om de l?nkade kontona inte anv?ndes av en person), inte bara ett annat konto, som du p?stod.
Fr?gor:
Kan du p? n?got s?tt rationellt f?rklara datamatchningarna mellan ditt konto och tv? andra konton p? detta casino?
Anv?nde din syster ?ven bonusar p? MyStake Casino? Om s? ?r fallet, vilken/vilka bonus(er) anv?nde hon?
Kan du ge oss mer information om ett annat l?nkat konto och aktiviteten p? det?
?r det m?jligt att minst tv? andra konton vid n?got tillf?lle anv?nde samma IP-adress/internetanslutning eller till och med samma enhet f?r att komma ?t casinots webbplats?
Tack. Ser fram emot att h?ra fr?n dig.
Greetings all,
Thank you, MyStake Team, for your email and for providing supporting details.
Dear jace_18,
Thank you for your email with additional information, too. However, I am not sure what you were trying to tell with the attached screenshot, and considering all the details provided by the casino, although you tried to clarify the situation and circumstances, unfortunately, it does not make much sense.
I would like to explain a few things and have a few more questions for you.
You asked why matches in IP addresses and gameplay with other users are considered fraudulent.
Considering the mentioned data matches (besides other matches that were not stated in the thread for understandable reasons), imagine an example situation -> It is allowed to own only 1 account per user/IP/household/address/etc. The same applies to bonuses - only 1 bonus per user/account is allowed (let's say a welcome deposit bonus). We are talking about industry-standard rules, and it is completely alright that the casinos need to protect themselves in this way, against fraudsters and abusers, and players accept these rules during registration. Then, during verification, the casino finds out these data matches (for example, IP(s) and gameplay matches between 2 or more accounts), which used bonuses - and I am not talking about other matches now.
In such a case, when there are several data matches between the linked accounts, even gameplay and the games played, while it does not matter when the IP match occurred, or that the accounts were registered from different physical addresses, it strongly indicates multiple accounts - more than 1 account used by 1 user, which is strictly prohibited in all online casinos, especially if the linked accounts used bonuses, because it also breaches bonus rules (bonus abuse, because the same type of bonus was used more than once per player). Therefore, the user is not eligible for winnings obtained in such a way, especially not if the winnings were accumulated from a bonus. In addition, after detecting such a situation, even KYC/verification is impossible.
If there are matches in the data between accounts, as mentioned above, the casino cannot verify whether 1 user used the linked accounts, and any of the owners of such accounts cannot prove the linked accounts were not used by one person. Therefore, rules prohibiting more than 1 account and more than 1 bonus per user/IP/household/etc exist, and therefore, such data matches are considered fraudulent.
Now - your particular situation.
Unfortunately, even if you know about another account (your sister playing at the same casino), the details from the casino clearly confirm at least 2 other accounts linked to yours, by specific and unlikely data matches (which would be too much of coincidence if the linked accounts were not used by 1 person), not only 1 other account, as you claimed.
Questions:
Can you please somehow rationally explain the data matches between your account and 2 other accounts at this casino?
Did your sister also claim/use bonuses at MyStake Casino? If so, what bonus(es) did she use?
Can you provide us with more information regarding another linked account and the activity on it?
Is it possible that at some moment, at least 2 other accounts used the same IP address/internet connection or even the same device to access the casino website?
Thank you. Looking forward to hearing from you.
Automatiskt ?versatt: