I det h?r casinot spelade jag vanligtvis slots.
Vissa av slotsen har speciella regler, som free spins f?r att samla ett visst antal symboler.
Det finns andra slots d?r en del av vinsterna sl?s ihop och kan tj?nas in genom att spela n?gra.
(t.ex. Sweet Alchemy)

Om casinot hade gett mig ett ordentligt f?rhandsbesked, kunde jag ha anv?nt mitt ?terst?ende saldo f?r att spela slots och f? gratissnurr och spela.
D? ?ndras balansen.
Att i f?rv?g veta att ditt konto kommer att st?ngas g?r stor skillnad i praktiken.
(Skulle det inte finnas incidenter d?r ett konto st?ngs av medan en bonus sm?lts, och ?ven om inkassering ?r realistisk, anses det inte vara en cache? Om vi informerades i f?rv?g skulle den typen av problem elimineras, skulle'' inte det?)
Hade jag vetat i f?rv?g hade jag kunnat f? min rakeback.
(Kasinot hade ett system d?r inl?senfrekvensen f?r rakeback ?kade n?r spelarens VIP-niv? ?kade, vilket var en mekanism f?r att h?lla inne rakeback-kvitton.)
Har jag r?tt n?r jag f?rst?r att rakebacken inte ?r spelarens pengar?
Dessutom spelar jag inte med bonuspengar.
Kasinot hade en v?ldefinierad upps?ttning spel som inte kunde spelas med bonusen.
In this casino I usually played the slots.
Some of the slots have special rules, such as free spins for collecting a certain number of symbols.
There are other slots where a portion of the winnings are pooled and can be earned by playing some.
(e.g. Sweet Alchemy)

If the casino had given me proper advance notice, I could have used my remaining balance to play the slots and get free spins and play.
Then the balance will change.
Knowing in advance that your account will be closed makes a big difference in practice.
(Wouldn't there be incidents where an account is suspended while a bonus is being digested, and even if cashing is realistic, it is not considered a cache? If we were informed in advance, that kind of trouble would be eliminated, wouldn't it?)
If I had known in advance, I could have received my rakeback.
(The casino had a system where the rakeback redemption rate increased as the player's VIP level increased, which was a mechanism to withhold rakeback receipts.)
Am I correct in understanding that the rakeback is not the player's money?
Also, I am not playing with bonus money.
The casino had a well-defined set of games that could not be played with the bonus.
Redigerad
Automatiskt ?versatt: